The Reference-Corrected Visual Predictive Check: A More Intuitive Diagnostic for Non-Linear Mixed Effects Models

The prediction-corrected visual predictive check (pcVPC) is an informative model diagnostic that can offer advantages over the standard visual predictive check (VPC) when heterogenous study designs and adaptive dosing are used. However, a drawback with these plots is that prediction correction often results in y-axis values and trends that are unintuitive, difficult to explain, and challenging to communicate even among experts. The reference-corrected visual predictive check (rcVPC) offers a solution to these problems by leveraging a user-defined set of independent variables, for a more intuitive model diagnostic and an efficient communication of results to a wider audience. The rcVPC methodology is based on the definition of a reference dataset. Simulations are conducted with this reference dataset and the observed dataset, and then the simulated and the observed dependent variables are normalized by the population prediction for the user-defined independent variables in the reference dataset. The opportunity to manipulate time in the reference dataset is a unique feature that gives rcVPC the ability to visually characterize exposure-response relationships with delayed effect onset. The rcVPC approach was compared to pcVPCs and traditional VPCs for a range of examples inspired by real data. The rcVPC methodology was demonstrated to offer a more intuitive interpretation and more effective guidance to model development in a way that is not possible for VPC or pcVPC plots.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The AAPS Journal
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01065-2
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Reference-Corrected Visual Predictive Check: A More Intuitive Diagnostic for Non-Linear Mixed Effects Models

E. Niclas Jonsson, Moustafa M. A. Ibrahim, Martin Bergstrand
4 citations
The AAPS Journal
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
10.52
article

The Reference-Corrected Visual Predictive Check: A More Intuitive Diagnostic for Non-Linear Mixed Effects Models

E. Niclas Jonsson, Moustafa M. A. Ibrahim, Martin Bergstrand
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The prediction-corrected visual predictive check (pcVPC) is an informative model diagnostic that can offer advantages over the standard visual predictive check (VPC) when heterogenous study designs and adaptive dosing are used. However, a drawback with these plots is that prediction correction often results in y-axis values and trends that are unintuitive, difficult to explain, and challenging to communicate even among experts. The reference-corrected visual predictive check (rcVPC) offers a solution to these problems by leveraging a user-defined set of independent variables, for a more intuitive model diagnostic and an efficient communication of results to a wider audience. The rcVPC methodology is based on the definition of a reference dataset. Simulations are conducted with this reference dataset and the observed dataset, and then the simulated and the observed dependent variables are normalized by the population prediction for the user-defined independent variables in the reference dataset. The opportunity to manipulate time in the reference dataset is a unique feature that gives rcVPC the ability to visually characterize exposure-response relationships with delayed effect onset. The rcVPC approach was compared to pcVPCs and traditional VPCs for a range of examples inspired by real data. The rcVPC methodology was demonstrated to offer a more intuitive interpretation and more effective guidance to model development in a way that is not possible for VPC or pcVPC plots.

The AAPS JournalVol. 27(4)
Prometheus (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
10.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.