Knowledge and comfort predict teaching about sexism in school teachers

Although lessons about sexism can increase gender egalitarianism in children, teachers often shy away from discussing sensitive topics, such as sexism, in classrooms. We conducted two studies to examine why teachers may not discuss sexism. In a qualitative study with 20 primary school teachers, teachers reported not discussing sexism because of the belief that sexism was not an issue, low comfort, and low knowledge levels in teaching sexism, that sexism was less important than other topics, and not enough support from parents and schools. Teachers taught about sexism to balance out other perspectives, when they had support from authorities, and when sexism was related to a lesson. Using the themes found in Study 1, Study 2 developed quantitative measures to examine the predictors of intentions to teach about sexism among 233 primary and secondary school teachers. The full model found that teachers had higher intentions to teach about sexism when they felt more comfortable and knowledgeable about teaching sexism and when teachers were younger. We discuss findings from both studies in terms of theoretical and practical implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychology of Education
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10049-1
Primary Topic
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge and comfort predict teaching about sexism in school teachers

Lauren Spinner, Bridget Dibb, Aífe Hopkins-Doyle, Rose Brett et al.
2 links
Social Psychology of Education
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
article

Knowledge and comfort predict teaching about sexism in school teachers

Lauren Spinner, Bridget Dibb, Aífe Hopkins-Doyle, Rose Brett, Harriet R. Tenenbaum, Lindsey Cameron, Andrea Kočiš
article en

Abstract

Although lessons about sexism can increase gender egalitarianism in children, teachers often shy away from discussing sensitive topics, such as sexism, in classrooms. We conducted two studies to examine why teachers may not discuss sexism. In a qualitative study with 20 primary school teachers, teachers reported not discussing sexism because of the belief that sexism was not an issue, low comfort, and low knowledge levels in teaching sexism, that sexism was less important than other topics, and not enough support from parents and schools. Teachers taught about sexism to balance out other perspectives, when they had support from authorities, and when sexism was related to a lesson. Using the themes found in Study 1, Study 2 developed quantitative measures to examine the predictors of intentions to teach about sexism among 233 primary and secondary school teachers. The full model found that teachers had higher intentions to teach about sexism when they felt more comfortable and knowledgeable about teaching sexism and when teachers were younger. We discuss findings from both studies in terms of theoretical and practical implications.

Social Psychology of EducationVol. 28(1)
University of Kent (GB), University of Surrey (GB), Tree Research and Education Endowment Fund (US), University of Portsmouth (GB)
European Commission, University of Surrey, Economic and Social Research Council, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Knowledge and comfort predict teaching about sexism in school teachers — Lauren Spinner, Bridget Dibb, et al. · Social Psychology of Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS