Governing by Checkpoints: Everyday Mobility and Control in Wartime Amhara

This article examines the everyday governance of mobility in the conflict-affected Amhara region of northern Ethiopia. In a fragmented and militarised landscape, checkpoints—erected by state forces, paramilitary groups such as Fano, and informal actors—have emerged as the dominant infrastructure of rule. Drawing on original fieldwork conducted in March 2025, the article explores how individuals navigate a fluid terrain of ad hoc control, where power is enacted not through institutions but through glances, silences, and bodily performances. Through the lens of “vernacular governance by passage,” the study reveals how movement becomes both a site of vulnerability and a modality of political negotiation. Theoretically, the article contributes to debates on fragmented sovereignty, affective governance, and the embodied dimensions of state power. It argues that governance in Amhara has not collapsed, but has migrated into movement itself—where checkpoints are not merely barriers but stages upon which authority is improvised, contested, and endured.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Kulturní studia
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7160/ks.2025-01(24).04
Primary Topic
African Studies and Geopolitics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing by Checkpoints: Everyday Mobility and Control in Wartime Amhara

Rediet Adane Derebe
Kulturní studia
African Studies and Geopolitics
article

Governing by Checkpoints: Everyday Mobility and Control in Wartime Amhara

Rediet Adane Derebe
article en

Abstract

This article examines the everyday governance of mobility in the conflict-affected Amhara region of northern Ethiopia. In a fragmented and militarised landscape, checkpoints—erected by state forces, paramilitary groups such as Fano, and informal actors—have emerged as the dominant infrastructure of rule. Drawing on original fieldwork conducted in March 2025, the article explores how individuals navigate a fluid terrain of ad hoc control, where power is enacted not through institutions but through glances, silences, and bodily performances. Through the lens of “vernacular governance by passage,” the study reveals how movement becomes both a site of vulnerability and a modality of political negotiation. Theoretically, the article contributes to debates on fragmented sovereignty, affective governance, and the embodied dimensions of state power. It argues that governance in Amhara has not collapsed, but has migrated into movement itself—where checkpoints are not merely barriers but stages upon which authority is improvised, contested, and endured.

Kulturní studiaVol. 2025(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
African Studies and Geopolitics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.