Astronaut dose coefficients calculated using GEANT4 and comparison with ICRP123

Fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients are fundamental ingredients to calculate astronaut radiation dose in space. For this purpose, the conversion coefficients for isotropic radiation provided by the International Commission on Radiological Protection in Publication 123 (ICRP123) are widely used. Understanding the uncertainties in these coefficients is important for a precise calculation of radiation dose. In this work, we present a systematic study of unshielded dose coefficients calculated by means of the GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit and the human voxel phantoms defined in ICRP Publication 110. Four GEANT4 physics lists, featured with two variations of electromagnetic and two variations of hadronic interaction models, were used in the study. Absorbed dose and dose equivalent coefficients with both the ICRP60 and NASA quality factors were calculated, for individual cosmic nuclei with charge from Z <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math> 1 to Z <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math> 28 and a kinetic energy range from 1 MeV/n to 100 GeV/n. The effective dose equivalent rates in free space at 1 AU were then calculated for each set of dose coefficients. The four effective dose equivalent rates calculated with each physics list agreed within <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> , and on average they were larger than the ICRP123 results by <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:mn>7</mml:mn> <mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> using the ICRP60 and the NASA quality factor, respectively. These results shed light on the systematic uncertainty of astronaut radiation exposure calculation, particularly from the physics interaction models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-025-01126-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Astronaut dose coefficients calculated using GEANT4 and comparison with ICRP123

Long Chen, Xuemei Chen, Ran Huo, Songying Xu et al.
2 citations
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
3.04
article

Astronaut dose coefficients calculated using GEANT4 and comparison with ICRP123

Long Chen, Xuemei Chen, Ran Huo, Songying Xu, W. Xu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients are fundamental ingredients to calculate astronaut radiation dose in space. For this purpose, the conversion coefficients for isotropic radiation provided by the International Commission on Radiological Protection in Publication 123 (ICRP123) are widely used. Understanding the uncertainties in these coefficients is important for a precise calculation of radiation dose. In this work, we present a systematic study of unshielded dose coefficients calculated by means of the GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit and the human voxel phantoms defined in ICRP Publication 110. Four GEANT4 physics lists, featured with two variations of electromagnetic and two variations of hadronic interaction models, were used in the study. Absorbed dose and dose equivalent coefficients with both the ICRP60 and NASA quality factors were calculated, for individual cosmic nuclei with charge from Z <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math> 1 to Z <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math> 28 and a kinetic energy range from 1 MeV/n to 100 GeV/n. The effective dose equivalent rates in free space at 1 AU were then calculated for each set of dose coefficients. The four effective dose equivalent rates calculated with each physics list agreed within <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> , and on average they were larger than the ICRP123 results by <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:mn>7</mml:mn> <mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> using the ICRP60 and the NASA quality factor, respectively. These results shed light on the systematic uncertainty of astronaut radiation exposure calculation, particularly from the physics interaction models.

Radiation and Environmental BiophysicsVol. 64(3)
University of Jinan (CN), Shandong Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.