Not All HER2-Positive Breast Cancers Are the Same: Intratumoral Heterogeneity, Low-Level HER2 Amplification, and Their Impact on Neoadjuvant Therapy Response

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancers are frequently treated with neoadjuvant anti-HER2 and chemotherapy (NACT). However, treatment response varies, with a subset of tumors showing high residual cancer burden (RCB). This study investigates the relationship between HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH), low-level HER2 amplification, and tumor response to NACT. A total of 205 post-NACT HER2-positive breast carcinomas with available RCB results were classified into the following 5 HER2 groups: (1) IHC 3+ (HER2 IHC positive, no fluorescence in situ hybridization performed), (2) Group 1-High (fluorescence in situ hybridization HER2 copies > 8 or HER2/CEP17 ratio > 4), (3) Group 1-Intermediate (HER2 copies > 6-8 or HER2/CEP17 ratio > 3-4), (4) Group 1-Low (HER2 copies 4-6 and HER2/CEP17 ratio 2-3), and (5) Group 3 (HER2 copies ≥ 6 and HER2/CEP17 ratio < 2). Low-level HER2 amplification, collectively designated as HER2 copies 4 to 8 or HER2/CEP17 ratio < 4, was associated with reduced response to HER2-targeted therapy and higher RCB post-NACT. HER2 IHC ITH, defined as the presence of at least 3 distinct staining intensities, with at least 10% of tumor cells exhibiting weak or no staining, was significantly more prevalent in low-level HER2 amplification groups (Group 1-Intermediate: 93.3%, Group 1-Low: 87.5%, and Group 3: 80.0%) compared with high-level amplification groups (IHC 3+: 24.7% and Group 1-High: 28.6%) (P < .001). Both low-level HER2 amplification and HER2 IHC ITH, regardless of hormone receptor status, were independently associated with poor treatment response, and tumors demonstrating both features had the highest likelihood of low therapeutic efficiency. These findings suggest that both low-level HER2 amplification and HER2 IHC ITH contribute to poor NACT response and may warrant alternative therapeutic strategies. Further prospective studies are needed to refine the clinical significance of low-level HER2 amplification and IHC ITH, particularly in the context of novel HER2-targeted therapies such as antibody-drug conjugates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Pathology
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100785
Citations
3
Primary Topic
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not All HER2-Positive Breast Cancers Are the Same: Intratumoral Heterogeneity, Low-Level HER2 Amplification, and Their Impact on Neoadjuvant Therapy Response

Jing Yu, Lakshmi Harinath, Jeffrey L. Fine, Rohit Bhargava et al.
3 citations
Modern Pathology
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
3.14
article

Not All HER2-Positive Breast Cancers Are the Same: Intratumoral Heterogeneity, Low-Level HER2 Amplification, and Their Impact on Neoadjuvant Therapy Response

Jing Yu, Lakshmi Harinath, Jeffrey L. Fine, Rohit Bhargava, Olga Navolotskaia, Beth Z. Clark, Wenli Dai, Tatiana Villatoro, Samaneh Motanagh
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancers are frequently treated with neoadjuvant anti-HER2 and chemotherapy (NACT). However, treatment response varies, with a subset of tumors showing high residual cancer burden (RCB). This study investigates the relationship between HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH), low-level HER2 amplification, and tumor response to NACT. A total of 205 post-NACT HER2-positive breast carcinomas with available RCB results were classified into the following 5 HER2 groups: (1) IHC 3+ (HER2 IHC positive, no fluorescence in situ hybridization performed), (2) Group 1-High (fluorescence in situ hybridization HER2 copies > 8 or HER2/CEP17 ratio > 4), (3) Group 1-Intermediate (HER2 copies > 6-8 or HER2/CEP17 ratio > 3-4), (4) Group 1-Low (HER2 copies 4-6 and HER2/CEP17 ratio 2-3), and (5) Group 3 (HER2 copies ≥ 6 and HER2/CEP17 ratio < 2). Low-level HER2 amplification, collectively designated as HER2 copies 4 to 8 or HER2/CEP17 ratio < 4, was associated with reduced response to HER2-targeted therapy and higher RCB post-NACT. HER2 IHC ITH, defined as the presence of at least 3 distinct staining intensities, with at least 10% of tumor cells exhibiting weak or no staining, was significantly more prevalent in low-level HER2 amplification groups (Group 1-Intermediate: 93.3%, Group 1-Low: 87.5%, and Group 3: 80.0%) compared with high-level amplification groups (IHC 3+: 24.7% and Group 1-High: 28.6%) (P < .001). Both low-level HER2 amplification and HER2 IHC ITH, regardless of hormone receptor status, were independently associated with poor treatment response, and tumors demonstrating both features had the highest likelihood of low therapeutic efficiency. These findings suggest that both low-level HER2 amplification and HER2 IHC ITH contribute to poor NACT response and may warrant alternative therapeutic strategies. Further prospective studies are needed to refine the clinical significance of low-level HER2 amplification and IHC ITH, particularly in the context of novel HER2-targeted therapies such as antibody-drug conjugates.

Modern PathologyVol. 38(7)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Magee-Womens Hospital (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
3.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.