Evaluating aufeis detection methods using Landsat imagery: Comparative assessment and recommendations

In the continuous permafrost environment of the North Slope of Alaska, extensive aufeis fields develop each winter on river floodplains, primarily via discharge from perennial springs. Currently, changes to the spatial and temporal distribution of large aufeis fields are predominantly monitored using optical satellite imagery. However, existing detection methods struggle to distinguish between snow and ice surfaces. This study compares the accuracy of two techniques for identifying aufeis in a dataset comprising 515 Landsat optical images across four aufeis fields on the North Slope of Alaska. The first method involves empirical thresholding on snow and ice indices (2FT), while the second applies random forest (RF) machine learning methods. We evaluate their performance on multiple training and test datasets with pixel-, image-, and site-based stratification. Additionally, we evaluate the utility of additional bands and indices in aufeis detection using a grid-search for the top features (3FT) and feature importance metrics. The more complex RF classifier, which relies on an extensive training dataset, outperforms both feature thresholding methods across all validation datasets with an average F1 score of 0.967±0.029. Feature importance metrics indicate that the near-infrared is effective for distinguishing between snow and ice surfaces. These findings demonstrate that machine learning approaches significantly enhance aufeis detection capabilities in snow-affected scenes and improve the retrieval of the annual maximum aufeis extent. While scaling challenges remain for these techniques, the results provide a foundation for improving our ability to monitor regional aufeis dynamics and their role in hydrologic and permafrost systems. • First intercomparison study of aufeis detection methods for Landsat imagery. • Aufeis detections using random forests outperform decision tree-based techniques. • The near-infrared improves aufeis classification accuracy in snow-covered scenes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science of Remote Sensing
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2025.100230
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating aufeis detection methods using Landsat imagery: Comparative assessment and recommendations

Simon Zwieback, Paul B. Leonard, Julian Dann, William Bolton
1 citations
Science of Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.80
article

Evaluating aufeis detection methods using Landsat imagery: Comparative assessment and recommendations

Simon Zwieback, Paul B. Leonard, Julian Dann, William Bolton
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the continuous permafrost environment of the North Slope of Alaska, extensive aufeis fields develop each winter on river floodplains, primarily via discharge from perennial springs. Currently, changes to the spatial and temporal distribution of large aufeis fields are predominantly monitored using optical satellite imagery. However, existing detection methods struggle to distinguish between snow and ice surfaces. This study compares the accuracy of two techniques for identifying aufeis in a dataset comprising 515 Landsat optical images across four aufeis fields on the North Slope of Alaska. The first method involves empirical thresholding on snow and ice indices (2FT), while the second applies random forest (RF) machine learning methods. We evaluate their performance on multiple training and test datasets with pixel-, image-, and site-based stratification. Additionally, we evaluate the utility of additional bands and indices in aufeis detection using a grid-search for the top features (3FT) and feature importance metrics. The more complex RF classifier, which relies on an extensive training dataset, outperforms both feature thresholding methods across all validation datasets with an average F1 score of 0.967±0.029. Feature importance metrics indicate that the near-infrared is effective for distinguishing between snow and ice surfaces. These findings demonstrate that machine learning approaches significantly enhance aufeis detection capabilities in snow-affected scenes and improve the retrieval of the annual maximum aufeis extent. While scaling challenges remain for these techniques, the results provide a foundation for improving our ability to monitor regional aufeis dynamics and their role in hydrologic and permafrost systems. • First intercomparison study of aufeis detection methods for Landsat imagery. • Aufeis detections using random forests outperform decision tree-based techniques. • The near-infrared improves aufeis classification accuracy in snow-covered scenes.

Science of Remote SensingVol. 11
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.