Core GRADE 2: choosing the target of certainty rating and assessing imprecision

This second article in a seven part series presents the Core GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to deciding on the target of the certainty rating, and decisions about rating down certainty of evidence due to imprecision. Core GRADE users assess if the true underlying treatment effect is important or not in relation to the minimal important difference (MID) or, alternatively, if a true underlying treatment effect exists. The location of the point estimate of effect in relation to the chosen threshold determines the target. For instance, using the MID thresholds, a point estimate greater than the MID suggests an important effect and less than the MID, an unimportant or little to no effect. Users then rate down for imprecision if the 95% confidence interval crosses the MID for benefit or harm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081904
Citations
29
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
39.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Core GRADE 2: choosing the target of certainty rating and assessing imprecision

Arnav Agarwal, Romina Brignardello‐Petersen, Thomas Agoritsas, Manya Prasad et al.
29 citations
BMJ
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
39.27
article

Core GRADE 2: choosing the target of certainty rating and assessing imprecision

Arnav Agarwal, Romina Brignardello‐Petersen, Thomas Agoritsas, Manya Prasad, Per Olav Vandvik, Gordon Guyatt, Monica Hultcrantz, Alfonso Iorio, Hans de Beer, Jamie Rylance, Chunjuan Zhai, M. Hassan Murad, Linan Zeng, Reem A. Mustafa, Liang Yao, Víctor M. Montori, Lingli Zhang, Prashanti Eachempati
article en
29 citations

Abstract

This second article in a seven part series presents the Core GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to deciding on the target of the certainty rating, and decisions about rating down certainty of evidence due to imprecision. Core GRADE users assess if the true underlying treatment effect is important or not in relation to the minimal important difference (MID) or, alternatively, if a true underlying treatment effect exists. The location of the point estimate of effect in relation to the chosen threshold determines the target. For instance, using the MID thresholds, a point estimate greater than the MID suggests an important effect and less than the MID, an unimportant or little to no effect. Users then rate down for imprecision if the 95% confidence interval crosses the MID for benefit or harm.

BMJVol. 389
Mayo Clinic (US), Nanyang Technological University (SG), University of Oslo (NO), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB), Sichuan University (CN), West China Medical Center of Sichuan University (CN), Karolinska Institutet (SE), West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), China First Heavy Industries (China) (CN), University Hospital of Geneva (CH), Shandong Provincial Hospital (CN), Manipal University College Malaysia (MY), Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (IN), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Stockholm Health Care Services (SE), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Impact (CA), Shandong First Medical University (CN), Child Guidance Center (US), Geneva College (US), University of Plymouth (GB), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
39.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.