Evaluating fracture volume loss during production process by comparative analysis of initial and second flowback data

The fracture volume is gradually changed with the depletion of fracture pressure during the production process. However, there are few flowback models available so far that can estimate the fracture volume loss using pressure transient and rate transient data. The initial flowback involves producing back the fracturing fluid after hydraulic fracturing, while the second flowback involves producing back the preloading fluid injected into the parent wells before fracturing of child wells. The main objective of this research is to compare the initial and second flowback data to capture the changes in fracture volume after production and preload processes. Such a comparison is useful for evaluating well performance and optimizing fracturing operations. We construct rate-normalized pressure (RNP) versus material balance time (MBT) diagnostic plots using both initial and second flowback data (FB<sub>i</sub> and FB<sub>s</sub>, respectively) of six multi-fractured horizontal wells completed in Niobrara and Codell formations in DJ Basin. In general, the slope of RNP plot during the FB<sub>s</sub> period is higher than that during the FB<sub>i</sub> period, indicating a potential loss of fracture volume from the FB<sub>i</sub> to the FB<sub>s</sub> period. We estimate the changes in effective fracture volume (<i>V</i> <sub>ef</sub>) by analyzing the changes in the RNP slope and total compressibility between these two flowback periods. <i>V</i> <sub>ef</sub> during FB<sub>s</sub> is in general 3%-45% lower than that during FB<sub>i</sub>. We also compare the drive mechanisms for the two flowback periods by calculating the compaction-drive index (CDI), hydrocarbon-drive index (HDI), and water-drive index (WDI). The dominant drive mechanism during both flowback periods is CDI, but its contribution is reduced by 16% in the FB<sub>s</sub> period. This drop is generally compensated by a relatively higher HDI during this period. The loss of effective fracture volume might be attributed to the pressure depletion in fractures, which occurs during the production period and can extend 800 days.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Coal Science & Technology
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-025-00754-9
Primary Topic
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating fracture volume loss during production process by comparative analysis of initial and second flowback data

Tamer Moussa, Hassan Dehghanpour, Chong Cao
International Journal of Coal Science & Technology
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
article

Evaluating fracture volume loss during production process by comparative analysis of initial and second flowback data

Tamer Moussa, Hassan Dehghanpour, Chong Cao
article en

Abstract

The fracture volume is gradually changed with the depletion of fracture pressure during the production process. However, there are few flowback models available so far that can estimate the fracture volume loss using pressure transient and rate transient data. The initial flowback involves producing back the fracturing fluid after hydraulic fracturing, while the second flowback involves producing back the preloading fluid injected into the parent wells before fracturing of child wells. The main objective of this research is to compare the initial and second flowback data to capture the changes in fracture volume after production and preload processes. Such a comparison is useful for evaluating well performance and optimizing fracturing operations. We construct rate-normalized pressure (RNP) versus material balance time (MBT) diagnostic plots using both initial and second flowback data (FB<sub>i</sub> and FB<sub>s</sub>, respectively) of six multi-fractured horizontal wells completed in Niobrara and Codell formations in DJ Basin. In general, the slope of RNP plot during the FB<sub>s</sub> period is higher than that during the FB<sub>i</sub> period, indicating a potential loss of fracture volume from the FB<sub>i</sub> to the FB<sub>s</sub> period. We estimate the changes in effective fracture volume (<i>V</i> <sub>ef</sub>) by analyzing the changes in the RNP slope and total compressibility between these two flowback periods. <i>V</i> <sub>ef</sub> during FB<sub>s</sub> is in general 3%-45% lower than that during FB<sub>i</sub>. We also compare the drive mechanisms for the two flowback periods by calculating the compaction-drive index (CDI), hydrocarbon-drive index (HDI), and water-drive index (WDI). The dominant drive mechanism during both flowback periods is CDI, but its contribution is reduced by 16% in the FB<sub>s</sub> period. This drop is generally compensated by a relatively higher HDI during this period. The loss of effective fracture volume might be attributed to the pressure depletion in fractures, which occurs during the production period and can extend 800 days.

International Journal of Coal Science & TechnologyVol. 12(1)
Sinopec (China) (CN)
Alberta Innovates, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.