The Islamic State in Contemporary Thought: A Critical Analysis of Wael Hallaq’s Perspective

This study presents a critical analysis of Wael Hallaq’s conception of the Islamic state and the limitations of the modern state. It highlights the fundamental contradictions between the centralized, coercive structure of modern states and the Sharia, which represents a normative order organically rooted in society and attuned to its cultural and religious specificities. Adopting an analytical-critical methodology, the study explores the theoretical foundations of Hallaq’s thesis and situates it within the broader landscape of Islamic political thought. It aims to contribute to academic debates concerning the prospects of political renewal in the Islamic world. The study concludes that a profound incompatibility exists between the modern state and the Sharia—in terms of both organizational philosophy and legislative sovereignty— rendering any attempt at reconciliation highly complex. Furthermore, it uncovers the lasting impact of colonial modernity, particularly in its imposition of legal and cultural hegemony on Muslim societies, which entailed the dismantling of Sharia’s social structures and the replacement of its traditional institutions with Western legal models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Posthumanism
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i5.1307
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Islamic State in Contemporary Thought: A Critical Analysis of Wael Hallaq’s Perspective

Iqbal Ahmad
1 citations
Journal of Posthumanism
Education and Islamic Studies
8.93
article

The Islamic State in Contemporary Thought: A Critical Analysis of Wael Hallaq’s Perspective

Iqbal Ahmad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study presents a critical analysis of Wael Hallaq’s conception of the Islamic state and the limitations of the modern state. It highlights the fundamental contradictions between the centralized, coercive structure of modern states and the Sharia, which represents a normative order organically rooted in society and attuned to its cultural and religious specificities. Adopting an analytical-critical methodology, the study explores the theoretical foundations of Hallaq’s thesis and situates it within the broader landscape of Islamic political thought. It aims to contribute to academic debates concerning the prospects of political renewal in the Islamic world. The study concludes that a profound incompatibility exists between the modern state and the Sharia—in terms of both organizational philosophy and legislative sovereignty— rendering any attempt at reconciliation highly complex. Furthermore, it uncovers the lasting impact of colonial modernity, particularly in its imposition of legal and cultural hegemony on Muslim societies, which entailed the dismantling of Sharia’s social structures and the replacement of its traditional institutions with Western legal models.

Journal of PosthumanismVol. 5(5)
Ministry of Health (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Education and Islamic Studies
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.