Effects of Oral Doxofylline and Procaterol on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Crossover Study

<b>Background</b>: Oral bronchodilators may serve as an adjunctive therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of oral doxofylline and oral procaterol on lung function and clinical symptoms in COPD patients. <b>Methods</b>: A crossover randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with clinically stable COPD. Participants first received either doxofylline or procaterol for 4 weeks, followed by a 1-week washout period. Assessments included the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, COPD assessment test (CAT) scores, and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD). Pulmonary function was evaluated using spirometry with bronchodilator (BD) testing and all adverse events were recorded. <b>Results</b>: Twenty patients were randomly assigned to begin treatment with either doxofylline or procaterol. Their mean age was 71.7 ± 9.4 years. After four weeks of treatment, the doxofylline group showed significantly greater improvement in pulmonary function parameters (post-BD peak expiratory flow and post-BD forced expiratory flow 25-75) compared to the procaterol group. However, there were no significant differences in mMRC scores, CAT scores, or 6MWD between the two groups. More neurological adverse events were observed in the doxofylline group compared to the procaterol group (35% vs. 5%, <i>p</i> = 0.044). <b>Conclusions</b>: Doxofylline improved pulmonary function in COPD patients but did not provide superior functional performance compared to procaterol. Neurological adverse events were more frequently associated with doxofylline. Doxofylline may serve as an adjunctive therapy to enhance pulmonary function in COPD patients, but caution is advised due to its potential side effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Sciences
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13020049
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Oral Doxofylline and Procaterol on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Crossover Study

Pitchayapa Ruchiwit, Narongkorn Saiphoklang, Sarawut Panichaporn, Thiravit Siriyothipun
Medical Sciences
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Effects of Oral Doxofylline and Procaterol on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Crossover Study

Pitchayapa Ruchiwit, Narongkorn Saiphoklang, Sarawut Panichaporn, Thiravit Siriyothipun
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Oral bronchodilators may serve as an adjunctive therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of oral doxofylline and oral procaterol on lung function and clinical symptoms in COPD patients. <b>Methods</b>: A crossover randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with clinically stable COPD. Participants first received either doxofylline or procaterol for 4 weeks, followed by a 1-week washout period. Assessments included the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, COPD assessment test (CAT) scores, and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD). Pulmonary function was evaluated using spirometry with bronchodilator (BD) testing and all adverse events were recorded. <b>Results</b>: Twenty patients were randomly assigned to begin treatment with either doxofylline or procaterol. Their mean age was 71.7 ± 9.4 years. After four weeks of treatment, the doxofylline group showed significantly greater improvement in pulmonary function parameters (post-BD peak expiratory flow and post-BD forced expiratory flow 25-75) compared to the procaterol group. However, there were no significant differences in mMRC scores, CAT scores, or 6MWD between the two groups. More neurological adverse events were observed in the doxofylline group compared to the procaterol group (35% vs. 5%, <i>p</i> = 0.044). <b>Conclusions</b>: Doxofylline improved pulmonary function in COPD patients but did not provide superior functional performance compared to procaterol. Neurological adverse events were more frequently associated with doxofylline. Doxofylline may serve as an adjunctive therapy to enhance pulmonary function in COPD patients, but caution is advised due to its potential side effects.

Medical SciencesVol. 13(2)
Thammasat University (TH)
Thammasat University
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effects of Oral Doxofylline and Procaterol on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Crossover Study — Pitchayapa Ruchiwit, Narongkorn Saiphoklang, et al. · Medical Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS