Physical Education Teachers’ Technology Self-Efficacy and Integration

Technology in education strives to parallel the high-tech world we live in. When students’ learning environment reflects the ways in which they engage the world, they will excel in their education (Christen, 2009). Physical education teachers (PETs) have reported many barriers to using and integrating educational technology (e.g., Hill & Valdez-Garcia, 2020). PETs' perceived self-efficacy (SE) may play an important role in their ability to integrate technology. The purpose of this study was to explore in-service PETs' self-efficacy to integrate technology into their teaching. Method: Eighty-three in-service PETs (Male=31.3%, Female=68.7%), from around the United States, completed an online version of the previously validated Computer Technology Integration Survey for Physical Education (Krause, 2017). Analysis focused on relationships of participant's SE and technology use. Results indicate a relationship with the level of mastery experiences (r=.48, p<.001), technology training (r=.45, p<.001), social persuasion experiences (r=.28, p<.001), and (vicarious experiences (r=.28, p<.01), to participants’ technology SE (M=3.70, SD= .94; 1-5 scale). Participants' specific technology training and use are presented, with corresponding correlations to indicate how well SE relates to use. Participants’ SE was lower than physical education student teachers (Krause, 2017) but similar to PET education faculty (O’Neil & Krause, 2019). PETs may be well equipped to use educational technology after student teaching but may need more training to keep up with the ever-changing world of technology. Professional development opportunities for PETs should focus on providing mastery experiences over vicarious and social persuasion experiences. Furthermore, some educational tools (i.e., Plickers) are valued and used more when PETs have an adequate level of specific educational technology training. Future research should focus on measuring the effects of a professional development workshop on PETs' SE.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Physical Educator
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18666/tpe-2025-v82-i3-11236
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gender and Technology in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical Education Teachers’ Technology Self-Efficacy and Integration

Anne Adams, Don Belcher
2 citations
The Physical Educator
Gender and Technology in Education
7.73
article

Physical Education Teachers’ Technology Self-Efficacy and Integration

Anne Adams, Don Belcher
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Technology in education strives to parallel the high-tech world we live in. When students’ learning environment reflects the ways in which they engage the world, they will excel in their education (Christen, 2009). Physical education teachers (PETs) have reported many barriers to using and integrating educational technology (e.g., Hill & Valdez-Garcia, 2020). PETs' perceived self-efficacy (SE) may play an important role in their ability to integrate technology. The purpose of this study was to explore in-service PETs' self-efficacy to integrate technology into their teaching. Method: Eighty-three in-service PETs (Male=31.3%, Female=68.7%), from around the United States, completed an online version of the previously validated Computer Technology Integration Survey for Physical Education (Krause, 2017). Analysis focused on relationships of participant's SE and technology use. Results indicate a relationship with the level of mastery experiences (r=.48, p<.001), technology training (r=.45, p<.001), social persuasion experiences (r=.28, p<.001), and (vicarious experiences (r=.28, p<.01), to participants’ technology SE (M=3.70, SD= .94; 1-5 scale). Participants' specific technology training and use are presented, with corresponding correlations to indicate how well SE relates to use. Participants’ SE was lower than physical education student teachers (Krause, 2017) but similar to PET education faculty (O’Neil & Krause, 2019). PETs may be well equipped to use educational technology after student teaching but may need more training to keep up with the ever-changing world of technology. Professional development opportunities for PETs should focus on providing mastery experiences over vicarious and social persuasion experiences. Furthermore, some educational tools (i.e., Plickers) are valued and used more when PETs have an adequate level of specific educational technology training. Future research should focus on measuring the effects of a professional development workshop on PETs' SE.

The Physical EducatorVol. 82(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender and Technology in Education
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Physical Education Teachers’ Technology Self-Efficacy and Integration — Anne Adams, Don Belcher · The Physical Educator (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS