Differential Diagnosis Skills in Physician Assistant Students

This study explored physician assistant (PA) educators' perceptions of a potential deficit in differential diagnosis proficiency (DDP) among PA students and sought to identify effective strategies for curricular improvement. DDP is a foundational clinical skill that requires robust medical knowledge, critical thinking, and the ability to synthesize patient information into diagnostic possibilities. Deficiencies in these skills can lead to diagnostic delays, unnecessary testing, and suboptimal patient outcomes. Despite its clinical importance, limited research has investigated how well PA programs cultivate DDP or what interventions may enhance it. A cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey was administered to 68 PA educators via a secure listserv. The instrument included Likert-type questions and open-response items that assessed whether respondents perceived a deficit in DDP among their students, how severe they considered the issue to be, and what strategies they recommended for addressing it. Of the respondents, 64.7% (n = 44) affirmed the existence of a DDP deficit. The majority of those respondents (68.2%, n = 30) rated the issue as moderate in severity, while 13.6% (n = 6) considered it minor, and 18.2% (n = 8) deemed it significant. When asked to recommend instructional strategies, respondents most frequently endorsed three equally preferred interventions: incorporating team-based learning events, utilizing instructor-led case studies, and integrating DDP content into existing medicine courses. Each of these received 23.3% of the total votes. Notably, team-based learning also emerged as the most commonly selected second-choice approach, suggesting strong overall support for active, collaborative learning formats. Respondents indicated that overburdened faculty and insufficient formal instruction were the most likely contributors to the DDP gap. This study offers early evidence that PA educators widely perceive a need to enhance DDP training in existing curricula. The preference for interactive instructional strategies underscores a growing belief that passive, lecture-based methods may be insufficient for cultivating diagnostic reasoning skills. These findings support the integration of active learning modalities into PA education and lay the groundwork for further research. Future studies with larger, multi-institutional samples are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate the impact of specific interventions on DDP development and clinical performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.83190
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential Diagnosis Skills in Physician Assistant Students

Elizabeth Lipman Leonard
Cureus
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Differential Diagnosis Skills in Physician Assistant Students

Elizabeth Lipman Leonard
article en

Abstract

This study explored physician assistant (PA) educators' perceptions of a potential deficit in differential diagnosis proficiency (DDP) among PA students and sought to identify effective strategies for curricular improvement. DDP is a foundational clinical skill that requires robust medical knowledge, critical thinking, and the ability to synthesize patient information into diagnostic possibilities. Deficiencies in these skills can lead to diagnostic delays, unnecessary testing, and suboptimal patient outcomes. Despite its clinical importance, limited research has investigated how well PA programs cultivate DDP or what interventions may enhance it. A cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey was administered to 68 PA educators via a secure listserv. The instrument included Likert-type questions and open-response items that assessed whether respondents perceived a deficit in DDP among their students, how severe they considered the issue to be, and what strategies they recommended for addressing it. Of the respondents, 64.7% (n = 44) affirmed the existence of a DDP deficit. The majority of those respondents (68.2%, n = 30) rated the issue as moderate in severity, while 13.6% (n = 6) considered it minor, and 18.2% (n = 8) deemed it significant. When asked to recommend instructional strategies, respondents most frequently endorsed three equally preferred interventions: incorporating team-based learning events, utilizing instructor-led case studies, and integrating DDP content into existing medicine courses. Each of these received 23.3% of the total votes. Notably, team-based learning also emerged as the most commonly selected second-choice approach, suggesting strong overall support for active, collaborative learning formats. Respondents indicated that overburdened faculty and insufficient formal instruction were the most likely contributors to the DDP gap. This study offers early evidence that PA educators widely perceive a need to enhance DDP training in existing curricula. The preference for interactive instructional strategies underscores a growing belief that passive, lecture-based methods may be insufficient for cultivating diagnostic reasoning skills. These findings support the integration of active learning modalities into PA education and lay the groundwork for further research. Future studies with larger, multi-institutional samples are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate the impact of specific interventions on DDP development and clinical performance.

CureusVol. 17(4)
Barry University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.