Monopsony: Wages, Wage Bargaining and Job Requirements

Abstract Using linked vacancy-employer-employee data from Austria, we investigate how monopsony power affects firms’ posting behavior and wage negotiations. Consistent with theoretical predictions, we find that firms with greater monopsony power post lower wages and offer fewer non-wage amenities, suggesting that wages and non-wage benefits are complementary. However, we find no evidence that monopsonistic firms demand higher levels of skill or education. Instead, our results indicate that they require more basic skills, particularly those related to routine tasks. On the workers’ side, we find that employees hired in monopsonistic labor markets face significantly lower wages, both initially and in the long run. These lower wages are driven by both lower posted wages and reduced bargaining power, as well as reduced opportunities to climb the wage ladder later.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
German Economic Review
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ger-2024-0128
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monopsony: Wages, Wage Bargaining and Job Requirements

Rudolf Winter‐Ebmer, Bernhard Schmidpeter, Jasmin Anderlik, Malika Jumaniyozova
2 citations
German Economic Review
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
6.26
article

Monopsony: Wages, Wage Bargaining and Job Requirements

Rudolf Winter‐Ebmer, Bernhard Schmidpeter, Jasmin Anderlik, Malika Jumaniyozova
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Using linked vacancy-employer-employee data from Austria, we investigate how monopsony power affects firms’ posting behavior and wage negotiations. Consistent with theoretical predictions, we find that firms with greater monopsony power post lower wages and offer fewer non-wage amenities, suggesting that wages and non-wage benefits are complementary. However, we find no evidence that monopsonistic firms demand higher levels of skill or education. Instead, our results indicate that they require more basic skills, particularly those related to routine tasks. On the workers’ side, we find that employees hired in monopsonistic labor markets face significantly lower wages, both initially and in the long run. These lower wages are driven by both lower posted wages and reduced bargaining power, as well as reduced opportunities to climb the wage ladder later.

German Economic ReviewVol. 26(4)
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research (DE), IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE), Chamber of Labour (AT), Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB), Institut für Höhere Studien - Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS) (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.