The Impact of Kidnapping and Insecurity on Industrial Workforce Stability and Productivity in Nigeria
This study examines the pervasive issue of kidnapping and insecurity and their profound impacts on industrial workforce stability and productivity in Nigeria. The rising incidences of abductions and violence have created an environment of fear and instability, leading to significant challenges for industries operating in high-risk regions like Lagos, Rivers and Anambra States. The study gathered data through a historical research approach, utilizing mainly secondary sources. Secondary data drawn from various published and unpublished sources such as reports, monographs, journals, textbooks, newspapers, industry reports, magazines and government publications were used for the study’s theoretical and conceptual framework. Secondary data was analyzed through qualitative content analysis. The study provides a nuanced understanding of how insecurity disrupts industrial operations and impedes economic growth. Theoretical frameworks such as Human Capital Theory and Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs are employed to analyze the interplay between insecurity and workforce dynamics. Findings reveal that insecurity leads to high employee turnover, reduced productivity, and declining competitiveness of Nigerian industries. The study underscores the urgency of strategic interventions, including enhanced security infrastructure, workforce welfare programs, and collaborative efforts between government and industries to mitigate these adverse effects. By addressing these challenges, Nigeria can create a safer industrial environment, fostering sustainable economic development and workforce resilience.
Authors
- Chukwujekwu Onwuka
- Sunday Chike Dr. Achebe
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
- Published
- 2025-04-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.90400084
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.52