Comparative Analysis of 2D-CAD Comparison with Custom-Trained Computer Vision Models

In manufacturing environments, the ability to efficiently compare and analyze 2D Computer-Aided Design (CAD) drawings is critical for ensuring product quality, minimizing errors, and streamlining the design iteration process. Traditional manual comparison methods are time-intensive and prone to human errors, particularly when analyzing annotations, dimensions, and complex structural details. To address these challenges, this study presents a comparative analysis of state-of-the-art deep learning models—YOLOv8m, YOLOv8x, YOLO-NAS, and Faster R-CNN—for automated CAD design evaluation. The models were trained on a dataset of 5,000 CAD images, encompassing diverse mechanical components with varying complexities. The proposed system leverages object detection and Optical Character Recognition (OCR) techniques to extract and compare dimensions and notes with high precision. Experimental results demonstrate that YOLOv8m outperforms other models in terms of detection accuracy. The findings highlight the effectiveness of deep learning-based CAD comparison systems in reducing verification time and improving design evaluation accuracy. This study provides insights into the strengths and limitations of different computer vision models for CAD analysis, contributing to the advancement of automated design validation in manufacturing industries. This approach enhances the recognition accuracy of deep learning models, making dimension extraction and recognition more practical. The system achieves 90-95% accuracy in detecting dimensions and notes in the CAD designs, and 85-90% accuracy in text recognition. These findings highlight the effectiveness of AI-driven CAD comparison systems in reducing verification time and improving design evaluation accuracy, contributing to the advancement of automated design validation in manufacturing industries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metallurgical and Materials Engineering
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63278/1417
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of 2D-CAD Comparison with Custom-Trained Computer Vision Models

Shashikant V. Athawale, Roshni Sundrani
Metallurgical and Materials Engineering
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
article

Comparative Analysis of 2D-CAD Comparison with Custom-Trained Computer Vision Models

Shashikant V. Athawale, Roshni Sundrani
article en

Abstract

In manufacturing environments, the ability to efficiently compare and analyze 2D Computer-Aided Design (CAD) drawings is critical for ensuring product quality, minimizing errors, and streamlining the design iteration process. Traditional manual comparison methods are time-intensive and prone to human errors, particularly when analyzing annotations, dimensions, and complex structural details. To address these challenges, this study presents a comparative analysis of state-of-the-art deep learning models—YOLOv8m, YOLOv8x, YOLO-NAS, and Faster R-CNN—for automated CAD design evaluation. The models were trained on a dataset of 5,000 CAD images, encompassing diverse mechanical components with varying complexities. The proposed system leverages object detection and Optical Character Recognition (OCR) techniques to extract and compare dimensions and notes with high precision. Experimental results demonstrate that YOLOv8m outperforms other models in terms of detection accuracy. The findings highlight the effectiveness of deep learning-based CAD comparison systems in reducing verification time and improving design evaluation accuracy. This study provides insights into the strengths and limitations of different computer vision models for CAD analysis, contributing to the advancement of automated design validation in manufacturing industries. This approach enhances the recognition accuracy of deep learning models, making dimension extraction and recognition more practical. The system achieves 90-95% accuracy in detecting dimensions and notes in the CAD designs, and 85-90% accuracy in text recognition. These findings highlight the effectiveness of AI-driven CAD comparison systems in reducing verification time and improving design evaluation accuracy, contributing to the advancement of automated design validation in manufacturing industries.

Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringVol. 31(3)
Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies (IN), Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of 2D-CAD Comparison with Custom-Trained Computer Vision Models — Shashikant V. Athawale, Roshni Sundrani · Metallurgical and Materials Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS