Brain Tumour Classification: A Comparative Analysis of CNN Models and Generalisation Across Datasets

In the realm of medical diagnostics, the identification and categorization of brain tumors are critical tasks, and recent advancements in deep learning hold promise for enhancing these processes. Despite improvements in medical imaging technology, accurately diagnosing and classifying the brain tumors continues to pose a considerable challenge due to the complexity and heterogeneity of tumor types. This study addresses this problem by conducting a comparative evaluation of four convolutional neural network (CNN) models—MobileNet, ResNetV2, Inception-v3, and VGG16—for brain tumor image classification. Our approach involves training these models using an extensive brain tumor image dataset that includes four categories: pituitary tumor, meningioma tumor, glioma tumor, and no tumor. We then evaluate their performance in comparison to established pre-trained models like DenseNet, EfficientNet, and AlexNet. To gauge and compare the effectiveness of each model, we utilize metrics such as F1-score, accuracy, recall, precision, and ROC-AUC. Visualizations of accuracy and loss metrics are presented for clarity. The results indicate that while all models show strong performance, certain models exhibit particular strengths in specific classification tasks. For instance, ResNetV2 demonstrated the highest accuracy and generalization capability on external datasets, while MobileNet offered a balance between accuracy and computational efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ocit65031.2024.00069
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brain Tumour Classification: A Comparative Analysis of CNN Models and Generalisation Across Datasets

A.N. Kamal, Santos Kumar Baliarsingh, Prabhu Prasad Dev, Aditya Saha et al.
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
article

Brain Tumour Classification: A Comparative Analysis of CNN Models and Generalisation Across Datasets

A.N. Kamal, Santos Kumar Baliarsingh, Prabhu Prasad Dev, Aditya Saha, Jitendra Jain, A. Lumini C Manna
article en

Abstract

In the realm of medical diagnostics, the identification and categorization of brain tumors are critical tasks, and recent advancements in deep learning hold promise for enhancing these processes. Despite improvements in medical imaging technology, accurately diagnosing and classifying the brain tumors continues to pose a considerable challenge due to the complexity and heterogeneity of tumor types. This study addresses this problem by conducting a comparative evaluation of four convolutional neural network (CNN) models—MobileNet, ResNetV2, Inception-v3, and VGG16—for brain tumor image classification. Our approach involves training these models using an extensive brain tumor image dataset that includes four categories: pituitary tumor, meningioma tumor, glioma tumor, and no tumor. We then evaluate their performance in comparison to established pre-trained models like DenseNet, EfficientNet, and AlexNet. To gauge and compare the effectiveness of each model, we utilize metrics such as F1-score, accuracy, recall, precision, and ROC-AUC. Visualizations of accuracy and loss metrics are presented for clarity. The results indicate that while all models show strong performance, certain models exhibit particular strengths in specific classification tasks. For instance, ResNetV2 demonstrated the highest accuracy and generalization capability on external datasets, while MobileNet offered a balance between accuracy and computational efficiency.

KIIT University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.