A meta-analysis of persuasive design, engagement, and efficacy in 92 RCTs of mental health apps

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy of digital mental health apps and the impact of persuasive design principles on intervention engagement and outcomes. Ninety-two RCTs and 16,728 participants were included in the meta-analyses. Findings indicate that apps significantly improved clinical outcomes compared to controls (g = 0.43). Persuasive design principles ranged from 1 to 12 per app (mode = 5). Engagement data were reported in 76% of studies, with 25 distinct engagement metrics identified, the most common being the percentage of users who completed the intervention and the average percentage of modules completed. No significant association was found between persuasive principles and either efficacy or engagement. With 25 distinct engagement metrics and 24% of studies not reporting engagement data, establishing overall engagement with mental health apps remains unfeasible. Standardising the definition of engagement and implementing a structured framework for reporting engagement metrics and persuasive design elements are essential steps toward advancing effective, engaging interventions in real-world settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01567-5
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A meta-analysis of persuasive design, engagement, and efficacy in 92 RCTs of mental health apps

Shaminka N. Mangelsdorf, Jordan D. X. Hinton, Shane Cross, Imogen Bell et al.
19 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Digital Mental Health Interventions
29.33
article

A meta-analysis of persuasive design, engagement, and efficacy in 92 RCTs of mental health apps

Shaminka N. Mangelsdorf, Jordan D. X. Hinton, Shane Cross, Imogen Bell, Sarah Bendall, Wilma Peters, Lee Valentine, Shaunagh O’Sullivan, Jennifer Nicholas, Luke Boyd, Carl I. Moller, Mario Álvarez‐Jiménez, Marisol Vega, Carla McEnery, Ping Liu, Thomas W. Wren, Kriti Bajaj, Rory P. Sorenson
article en
19 citations

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy of digital mental health apps and the impact of persuasive design principles on intervention engagement and outcomes. Ninety-two RCTs and 16,728 participants were included in the meta-analyses. Findings indicate that apps significantly improved clinical outcomes compared to controls (g = 0.43). Persuasive design principles ranged from 1 to 12 per app (mode = 5). Engagement data were reported in 76% of studies, with 25 distinct engagement metrics identified, the most common being the percentage of users who completed the intervention and the average percentage of modules completed. No significant association was found between persuasive principles and either efficacy or engagement. With 25 distinct engagement metrics and 24% of studies not reporting engagement data, establishing overall engagement with mental health apps remains unfeasible. Standardising the definition of engagement and implementing a structured framework for reporting engagement metrics and persuasive design elements are essential steps toward advancing effective, engaging interventions in real-world settings.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
Deakin University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Latrobe Regional Hospital (AU), Orygen (AU), Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor (ES)
Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
29.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.