TRADITION IN THE FUNDAMENTALS OF RELIGION AMONG ANCIENT AND MODERN THEOLOGIANS: AN ANALYTICAL AND CRITICAL STUDY

The aim of the research is to identify the concept of imitation in the fundamentals of religion and its ruling, and to explain the truth of imitation in the fundamentals of religion according to ancient theologians, and to know the truth of imitation in the fundamentals of religion according to modern theologians.Matters of belief must be attained with certainty from conclusive evidence, for everyone who has established conclusive evidence He must be knowledgeable and diligent, and not considered an imitator.This research deals with the issue of imitation in the principles of religion according to ancient and modern theologians.In the view of theologians, he is one who imitates others in matters of belief without consideration and reasoning in accordance with rational evidence.This issue is one of the important issues over which there has been a long debate among theologians.In the past and in the present, it has serious effects.In spite of this, the problem of the study was to explain the rule of imitation in the foundations of religion according to ancient and modern theologians.The researcher followed the descriptive approach, the analytical approach, and the critical approach, and the research concluded with the most important results and recommendations.The authors of the theological approaches made a mistake in leaving The approach of the Qur'an and the Sunnah to the approaches of humans, which resulted in doctrinal corruptions in judging the faith of the one who abandons rational reasoning according to their approaches, just as the evidence that necessitates consideration and inference of the accountable according to the Mu'tazilites is reason, while the Sharia is the evidence that necessitates consideration and inference of the accountable according to the Ash'aris, and he recommended Researching the necessity of calling for mediation, holding dialogue and argumentative sessions and debates between all groups, fairness, mediation, and non-exaggeration between different opinions .

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47832/2757-5403.28.28
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TRADITION IN THE FUNDAMENTALS OF RELIGION AMONG ANCIENT AND MODERN THEOLOGIANS: AN ANALYTICAL AND CRITICAL STUDY

Eid Ayed Mubarak Wateen AL-AZMI
International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research
Historical and Linguistic Studies
article

TRADITION IN THE FUNDAMENTALS OF RELIGION AMONG ANCIENT AND MODERN THEOLOGIANS: AN ANALYTICAL AND CRITICAL STUDY

Eid Ayed Mubarak Wateen AL-AZMI
article en

Abstract

The aim of the research is to identify the concept of imitation in the fundamentals of religion and its ruling, and to explain the truth of imitation in the fundamentals of religion according to ancient theologians, and to know the truth of imitation in the fundamentals of religion according to modern theologians.Matters of belief must be attained with certainty from conclusive evidence, for everyone who has established conclusive evidence He must be knowledgeable and diligent, and not considered an imitator.This research deals with the issue of imitation in the principles of religion according to ancient and modern theologians.In the view of theologians, he is one who imitates others in matters of belief without consideration and reasoning in accordance with rational evidence.This issue is one of the important issues over which there has been a long debate among theologians.In the past and in the present, it has serious effects.In spite of this, the problem of the study was to explain the rule of imitation in the foundations of religion according to ancient and modern theologians.The researcher followed the descriptive approach, the analytical approach, and the critical approach, and the research concluded with the most important results and recommendations.The authors of the theological approaches made a mistake in leaving The approach of the Qur'an and the Sunnah to the approaches of humans, which resulted in doctrinal corruptions in judging the faith of the one who abandons rational reasoning according to their approaches, just as the evidence that necessitates consideration and inference of the accountable according to the Mu'tazilites is reason, while the Sharia is the evidence that necessitates consideration and inference of the accountable according to the Ash'aris, and he recommended Researching the necessity of calling for mediation, holding dialogue and argumentative sessions and debates between all groups, fairness, mediation, and non-exaggeration between different opinions .

International Journal of Humanities and Educational ResearchVol. 06(05)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.