Structure and changing trends of carbon footprint in sugarcane

Abstract Carbon footprint is vital for the sustainable development of sugarcane industry. In this study, a systematic investigation involving a life cycle approach, structure analysis, sensitivity analysis and the individual fixed regression was conducted on the structure, changing trends and driving factors of carbon footprint in Chinese sugarcane industry from 2012 to 2021. Results showed that the national average value of carbon footprint per unit area was 7.8317 t CO 2 e ha −1 , whereas the average carbon footprint of yield and output were 0.1029 t CO 2 e t −1 and 0.2311 kg CO 2 e yuan −1 , respectively. Notably, significant differences were observed in the carbon footprint of each main production region. Due to regional natural resource conditions, variations in industrial structure and differences in cultivation technology, Guangdong had the highest average carbon footprint per unit area (8.8213 t CO 2 e ha −1 ), while Hainan exhibited the lowest carbon footprint per unit area (7.0263 t CO 2 e ha −1 ), which was 79.65% of that in Guangdong. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that when the major carbon source varies ±40%, the indirect sensitivity coefficient was 0.9775. Interestingly, Yunnan displayed the highest direct sensitivity (0.9802), while the weakest direct sensitivity (0.6098) was observed in Guangxi. At both natural and social levels, the main drivers of carbon footprint in sugarcane were fertilizer, agricultural film, sugarcane machinery and the disposable income of rural residents. From all the above, optimizing cultivation practices and machinery use, reducing fertilizer and agricultural film inputs while maintaining high yield and high sugar production and low-carbon utilization of straw represent the three directions for low-carbon sugarcane production in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/add1f6
Primary Topic
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structure and changing trends of carbon footprint in sugarcane

Chen Ru-kai, Niandong Chen, Qibin Wu, Ting He et al.
2 links
Environmental Research Letters
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
article

Structure and changing trends of carbon footprint in sugarcane

Chen Ru-kai, Niandong Chen, Qibin Wu, Ting He, Yuan Xie, Youxiong Que, Yuyue Que
article en

Abstract

Abstract Carbon footprint is vital for the sustainable development of sugarcane industry. In this study, a systematic investigation involving a life cycle approach, structure analysis, sensitivity analysis and the individual fixed regression was conducted on the structure, changing trends and driving factors of carbon footprint in Chinese sugarcane industry from 2012 to 2021. Results showed that the national average value of carbon footprint per unit area was 7.8317 t CO 2 e ha −1 , whereas the average carbon footprint of yield and output were 0.1029 t CO 2 e t −1 and 0.2311 kg CO 2 e yuan −1 , respectively. Notably, significant differences were observed in the carbon footprint of each main production region. Due to regional natural resource conditions, variations in industrial structure and differences in cultivation technology, Guangdong had the highest average carbon footprint per unit area (8.8213 t CO 2 e ha −1 ), while Hainan exhibited the lowest carbon footprint per unit area (7.0263 t CO 2 e ha −1 ), which was 79.65% of that in Guangdong. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that when the major carbon source varies ±40%, the indirect sensitivity coefficient was 0.9775. Interestingly, Yunnan displayed the highest direct sensitivity (0.9802), while the weakest direct sensitivity (0.6098) was observed in Guangxi. At both natural and social levels, the main drivers of carbon footprint in sugarcane were fertilizer, agricultural film, sugarcane machinery and the disposable income of rural residents. From all the above, optimizing cultivation practices and machinery use, reducing fertilizer and agricultural film inputs while maintaining high yield and high sugar production and low-carbon utilization of straw represent the three directions for low-carbon sugarcane production in the future.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(6)
Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (CN), Fujian Polytechnic of Information Technology (CN), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.