ROLE OF MICRO‐INNOVATION IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION: THE CASE OF SILK FILATURE IN JAPAN AND COLONIAL INDIA

In the 18th century, the East India Company introduced Italian filature technology to the silk‐reeling industry in the Indian province of Bengal in order to produce silk suitable for the European market. The experiment failed in Bengal despite its superiority over the traditional method and eventually moved to Japan in the late 19th century, where it was successfully adopted. In this paper, drawing on the Japanese case, we examine the reasons behind filature's failure in Bengal. We focus on the role of micro‐innovation in technology adoption and argue that in Bengal's case, the East India Company failed to provide incentive for such micro‐innovation because of its dual status as the monopoly trader and de facto ruler of Bengal. On the other hand, the Japanese silk industry was characterized by competition, which played a key role in the successful technology adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Developing Economies
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/deve.12442
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ROLE OF MICRO‐INNOVATION IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION: THE CASE OF SILK FILATURE IN JAPAN AND COLONIAL INDIA

Anirban Mukherjee, Subhasree Sarkar
The Developing Economies
Economic and Technological Innovation
article

ROLE OF MICRO‐INNOVATION IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION: THE CASE OF SILK FILATURE IN JAPAN AND COLONIAL INDIA

Anirban Mukherjee, Subhasree Sarkar
article en

Abstract

In the 18th century, the East India Company introduced Italian filature technology to the silk‐reeling industry in the Indian province of Bengal in order to produce silk suitable for the European market. The experiment failed in Bengal despite its superiority over the traditional method and eventually moved to Japan in the late 19th century, where it was successfully adopted. In this paper, drawing on the Japanese case, we examine the reasons behind filature's failure in Bengal. We focus on the role of micro‐innovation in technology adoption and argue that in Bengal's case, the East India Company failed to provide incentive for such micro‐innovation because of its dual status as the monopoly trader and de facto ruler of Bengal. On the other hand, the Japanese silk industry was characterized by competition, which played a key role in the successful technology adoption.

The Developing EconomiesVol. 63(4)
University of Calcutta (IN), Ashoka University (IN)
Indian National Science Academy
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Economic and Technological Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.