‘Matters of Household Proffit’: Sixteenth‐Century Manuscript and Print Exchanges in Bodleian Library, Ashmole 1477 <sup>☆</sup>

Abstract The household book is a particular feature of the landscape of manuscript production post‐1475, and is particularly associated with women. Compiling manuscript household books in a post‐print landscape involved a specific kind of dialogue between the two material forms. It is useful to reframe the practice of retranslating printed material (often based on works in manuscript or older works) into manuscript form as a kind of cultural exchange and, moreover, as an extension of the regular work practices of the female domestic sphere, many of which involve different types of transaction. This article considers the production of domestic household manuscript books in the context of exchange. I focus on several manuscripts copied by women, including Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Ashmole 1477, part of which can be linked to Dorothy Lewkenore, who began to compile her manuscript in the late sixteenth century. I also consider their attention to materiality, performativity, ownership and subjectivity as especially gendered, imagining a nexus of exchange involving the compiler and the object, and indeed other readers. These material artefacts can be usefully conceptualized as semi‐public spaces, not solely intended for consultation by one individual, and therefore having a transactional function that extends beyond the primary context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renaissance Studies
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rest.12993
Primary Topic
Renaissance Literature and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Matters of Household Proffit’: Sixteenth‐Century Manuscript and Print Exchanges in Bodleian Library, Ashmole 1477 ☆

Carrie Griffin
Renaissance Studies
Renaissance Literature and Culture
article

‘Matters of Household Proffit’: Sixteenth‐Century Manuscript and Print Exchanges in Bodleian Library, Ashmole 1477 ☆

Carrie Griffin
article en

Abstract

Abstract The household book is a particular feature of the landscape of manuscript production post‐1475, and is particularly associated with women. Compiling manuscript household books in a post‐print landscape involved a specific kind of dialogue between the two material forms. It is useful to reframe the practice of retranslating printed material (often based on works in manuscript or older works) into manuscript form as a kind of cultural exchange and, moreover, as an extension of the regular work practices of the female domestic sphere, many of which involve different types of transaction. This article considers the production of domestic household manuscript books in the context of exchange. I focus on several manuscripts copied by women, including Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Ashmole 1477, part of which can be linked to Dorothy Lewkenore, who began to compile her manuscript in the late sixteenth century. I also consider their attention to materiality, performativity, ownership and subjectivity as especially gendered, imagining a nexus of exchange involving the compiler and the object, and indeed other readers. These material artefacts can be usefully conceptualized as semi‐public spaces, not solely intended for consultation by one individual, and therefore having a transactional function that extends beyond the primary context.

Renaissance StudiesVol. 40(2)
University of Limerick (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Renaissance Literature and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.