Adherence and persistence among patients with hereditary angioedema receiving long-term prophylaxis in the United States

<b>Introduction:</b> Real-world evidence that compares the treatment patterns of targeted long-term prophylaxis (LTP) for hereditary angioedema (HAE), including berotralstat, lanadelumab, and subcutaneous (SC) plasma-derived C1 inhibitor (pdC1-INH) is limited. <b>Objective:</b> The study aimed to assess adherence and persistence after initiation of berotralstat, lanadelumab, or SC-pdC1-INH. <b>Methods:</b> Electronic health records linked to claims data was used to select patients ages ≥ 12 years, initiating one of three LTPs between June 22, 2017, and September 12, 2023, with mutually exclusive cohorts assigned hierarchically in reverse order of their U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval date. Patients were required to have ≥ 12 months of continuous enrollment before and after the LTP initiation date. Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics were captured. Primary study measures were adherence, defined as the mean proportion of days covered (PDC), and persistence, defined as having no gap in treatment ≥ 45 days after the LTP initiation date. A subgroup analysis was conducted among patients with two or more claims for their index LTP. A sensitivity analysis was performed by reassigning cohorts based on the first claim for qualifying LTP after June 22, 2017. <b>Results:</b> The main analysis included 357 patients (90 on berotralstat, 189 lanadelumab, and 78 SC-pdC1-INH). Overall, 46% to 51% of the patients had LTP experience. Adherence (mean PDC) was similar between treatments at 0.73, 0.78, and 0.74 for berotralstat, lanadelumab, and SC-pdC1-INH, respectively. Proportions of patients persistent on index LTP after 12 months were similar across LTPs: 61%, 58%, and 53% for berotralstat, lanadelumab, and SC-pdC1-INH, respectively. The findings of the subgroup and sensitivity analyses supported the main analysis. <b>Conclusion:</b> Adherence and persistence rates for all three LTP treatments were uniformly high. Berotralstat adherence and persistence were comparable with those observed after lanadelumab or SC-pdC1-INH initiation in the main analysis, among patients with two or more claims for their index LTP, and among cohorts assigned based on the first claim for qualifying LTP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Allergy and Asthma Proceedings
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2025.46.250029
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adherence and persistence among patients with hereditary angioedema receiving long-term prophylaxis in the United States

Isabelle Winer, Alex Dean, Sandra Nestler-Parr, Lorena López-González et al.
5 citations
Allergy and Asthma Proceedings
Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
8.13
article

Adherence and persistence among patients with hereditary angioedema receiving long-term prophylaxis in the United States

Isabelle Winer, Alex Dean, Sandra Nestler-Parr, Lorena López-González, Sandra C. Christiansen, Bruce L. Zuraw, Janna Manjelievskaia, Susan M. Wall, Patrick Gillard, James Lindemann Nelson
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Real-world evidence that compares the treatment patterns of targeted long-term prophylaxis (LTP) for hereditary angioedema (HAE), including berotralstat, lanadelumab, and subcutaneous (SC) plasma-derived C1 inhibitor (pdC1-INH) is limited. <b>Objective:</b> The study aimed to assess adherence and persistence after initiation of berotralstat, lanadelumab, or SC-pdC1-INH. <b>Methods:</b> Electronic health records linked to claims data was used to select patients ages ≥ 12 years, initiating one of three LTPs between June 22, 2017, and September 12, 2023, with mutually exclusive cohorts assigned hierarchically in reverse order of their U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval date. Patients were required to have ≥ 12 months of continuous enrollment before and after the LTP initiation date. Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics were captured. Primary study measures were adherence, defined as the mean proportion of days covered (PDC), and persistence, defined as having no gap in treatment ≥ 45 days after the LTP initiation date. A subgroup analysis was conducted among patients with two or more claims for their index LTP. A sensitivity analysis was performed by reassigning cohorts based on the first claim for qualifying LTP after June 22, 2017. <b>Results:</b> The main analysis included 357 patients (90 on berotralstat, 189 lanadelumab, and 78 SC-pdC1-INH). Overall, 46% to 51% of the patients had LTP experience. Adherence (mean PDC) was similar between treatments at 0.73, 0.78, and 0.74 for berotralstat, lanadelumab, and SC-pdC1-INH, respectively. Proportions of patients persistent on index LTP after 12 months were similar across LTPs: 61%, 58%, and 53% for berotralstat, lanadelumab, and SC-pdC1-INH, respectively. The findings of the subgroup and sensitivity analyses supported the main analysis. <b>Conclusion:</b> Adherence and persistence rates for all three LTP treatments were uniformly high. Berotralstat adherence and persistence were comparable with those observed after lanadelumab or SC-pdC1-INH initiation in the main analysis, among patients with two or more claims for their index LTP, and among cohorts assigned based on the first claim for qualifying LTP.

Allergy and Asthma ProceedingsVol. 46(3)
La Jolla Institute for Immunology (US), University of California San Diego (US), BioCryst Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), Diagnostics for the Real World (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
8.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.