Changing the status quo through democratic innovations? Three paradoxes from the Iberian Peninsula

Abstract Citizen distrust in mainstream politics has spurred the rise of new democratic processes for citizen participation and deliberation, known as democratic innovations. These innovations are believed to improve democracy by changing the status quo. This paper critically examines whether this goal is achieved by focusing on participatory budgeting and citizens’ assemblies in the Iberian Peninsula. Three paradoxes arise from our reflection, related to the role of elected officials, neutralization of policymaking, and evaluation of outcomes. These paradoxes suggest the need for further studies on how democratic innovations can change the status quo and contribute to democratizing our democracies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cadernos Metrópole
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2025-6368149-en
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changing the status quo through democratic innovations? Three paradoxes from the Iberian Peninsula

Roberto Falanga, Ernesto Ganuza
Cadernos Metrópole
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Changing the status quo through democratic innovations? Three paradoxes from the Iberian Peninsula

Roberto Falanga, Ernesto Ganuza
article en

Abstract

Abstract Citizen distrust in mainstream politics has spurred the rise of new democratic processes for citizen participation and deliberation, known as democratic innovations. These innovations are believed to improve democracy by changing the status quo. This paper critically examines whether this goal is achieved by focusing on participatory budgeting and citizens’ assemblies in the Iberian Peninsula. Three paradoxes arise from our reflection, related to the role of elected officials, neutralization of policymaking, and evaluation of outcomes. These paradoxes suggest the need for further studies on how democratic innovations can change the status quo and contribute to democratizing our democracies.

Cadernos MetrópoleVol. 27(63)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), University of Lisbon (PT), Lusíada University of Lisbon (PT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Changing the status quo through democratic innovations? Three paradoxes from the Iberian Peninsula — Roberto Falanga, Ernesto Ganuza · Cadernos Metrópole (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS