AI-Enabled Learning Engagement Assessment for Smart Classrooms: Applications, Trends and Opportunities

The swift progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has significantly highlighted the role of smart classrooms in modern educational contexts. Despite this development, there remain notable challenges in the automatic assessment of students' engagement within smart classroom environments. To delve deeper into the historical context and trends regarding the evaluation of learning engagement, this study meticulously gathered and analyzed a substantial body of literature, comprising 1,281 publications indexed in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). These records, spanning from January 1, 1991, to October 1, 2023, were sourced from the Web of Science core database utilizing the search term "Evaluation of learning engagement." To visually interpret and map the findings, CiteSpace 6.2.R5 was employed to examine the volume of relevant research, the countries contributing to it, affiliated institutions, keyword correlations, temporal trends, and cited references. The analysis reveals a burgeoning interest in applying AI technologies to the evaluation of learning engagement within smart classrooms. Over the span of three decades, the evaluation of learning engagement has experienced distinct phases of evolution, categorized into three primary periods: the embryonic stage from 1991 to 2008, the steadily developing phase between 2009 and 2016, and the rapid growth period from 2017 to 2023. During this timeframe, research output has been notably higher in the United States, Australia, and Canada, contrasting with Japan, which has contributed comparatively fewer publications. Among the institutions, the University of Toronto and the University of Sydney emerged as the most frequently cited, while the journal Computers Education garnered the highest impact factor in this field. The dominant research focus within this domain primarily revolves around defining and measuring learning engagement, examining its correlation with learning outcomes, identifying influential factors, and assessing various evaluation strategies. Furthermore, the most cited works concerning "Evaluation of learning engagement" predominantly explore themes related to motivation and engagement in online learning contexts, particularly how gamification affects student motivation and engagement in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of intelligence and knowledge engineering.
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62517/jike.202404411
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Enabled Learning Engagement Assessment for Smart Classrooms: Applications, Trends and Opportunities

Fengxia Wang, Wan Li-jun, Liu Wei
Journal of intelligence and knowledge engineering.
Online Learning and Analytics
article

AI-Enabled Learning Engagement Assessment for Smart Classrooms: Applications, Trends and Opportunities

Fengxia Wang, Wan Li-jun, Liu Wei
article en

Abstract

The swift progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has significantly highlighted the role of smart classrooms in modern educational contexts. Despite this development, there remain notable challenges in the automatic assessment of students' engagement within smart classroom environments. To delve deeper into the historical context and trends regarding the evaluation of learning engagement, this study meticulously gathered and analyzed a substantial body of literature, comprising 1,281 publications indexed in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). These records, spanning from January 1, 1991, to October 1, 2023, were sourced from the Web of Science core database utilizing the search term "Evaluation of learning engagement." To visually interpret and map the findings, CiteSpace 6.2.R5 was employed to examine the volume of relevant research, the countries contributing to it, affiliated institutions, keyword correlations, temporal trends, and cited references. The analysis reveals a burgeoning interest in applying AI technologies to the evaluation of learning engagement within smart classrooms. Over the span of three decades, the evaluation of learning engagement has experienced distinct phases of evolution, categorized into three primary periods: the embryonic stage from 1991 to 2008, the steadily developing phase between 2009 and 2016, and the rapid growth period from 2017 to 2023. During this timeframe, research output has been notably higher in the United States, Australia, and Canada, contrasting with Japan, which has contributed comparatively fewer publications. Among the institutions, the University of Toronto and the University of Sydney emerged as the most frequently cited, while the journal Computers Education garnered the highest impact factor in this field. The dominant research focus within this domain primarily revolves around defining and measuring learning engagement, examining its correlation with learning outcomes, identifying influential factors, and assessing various evaluation strategies. Furthermore, the most cited works concerning "Evaluation of learning engagement" predominantly explore themes related to motivation and engagement in online learning contexts, particularly how gamification affects student motivation and engagement in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs).

Journal of intelligence and knowledge engineering.Vol. 2(4)
Soochow University (CN)
Government of Jiangsu Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.