The Negative Footprint Illusion: Why Our 'Green' Choices Might Not Be So Green?

The Negative Footprint Illusion (NFI) is a cognitive bias that leads individuals to falsely assume that adding an environmentally friendly product or behavior reduces the overall environmental impact. This illusion distorts sustainability assessments, as people rely on averaging bias, compensatory green beliefs (CGB), framing effects, and quantity insensitivity instead of objectively evaluating total environmental impact. This review examines NFI as a cognitive barrier to sustainable nutrition, exploring its underlying mechanisms and their role in shaping environmental decision-making. Empirical evidence highlights how individuals miscalculate their carbon footprint, particularly in food consumption and energy-related decisions and how perceptual biases reinforce this illusion. Addressing these biases through strategic sustainability communication and evidence-based decision-making frameworks is crucial for fostering truly sustainable consumption behaviors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.1652929
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Negative Footprint Illusion: Why Our 'Green' Choices Might Not Be So Green?

Gizem UZLU, Hilal Yıldıran
1 citations
İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

The Negative Footprint Illusion: Why Our 'Green' Choices Might Not Be So Green?

Gizem UZLU, Hilal Yıldıran
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Negative Footprint Illusion (NFI) is a cognitive bias that leads individuals to falsely assume that adding an environmentally friendly product or behavior reduces the overall environmental impact. This illusion distorts sustainability assessments, as people rely on averaging bias, compensatory green beliefs (CGB), framing effects, and quantity insensitivity instead of objectively evaluating total environmental impact. This review examines NFI as a cognitive barrier to sustainable nutrition, exploring its underlying mechanisms and their role in shaping environmental decision-making. Empirical evidence highlights how individuals miscalculate their carbon footprint, particularly in food consumption and energy-related decisions and how perceptual biases reinforce this illusion. Addressing these biases through strategic sustainability communication and evidence-based decision-making frameworks is crucial for fostering truly sustainable consumption behaviors.

İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi(25)
İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.