Exploring strengths and areas for development in decision-making in central public administration through the examples of some organizations

Aim: The aim of the research is to use the Healthy Organization Model to explore what strengths and areas for development there are in the public administration, what factors, processes, and characteristics there are in the public administration in which the public administration works very well and effectively based on the interview results of some organizations of the central public administration. In this paper, I will focus on one of the 20 health-disease dimensions of the Healthy Organization Model, which is decision-making. I will illustrate its functioning through the examples of a few organizations in the central public administration. Methodology: Conducting semi-structured interviews with leaders at various levels in several central public administration organizations using an interview guide based on the Healthy Organization Model. Findings: There are organizations and units where this area functions exemplary; there are organizations and units where they face more difficulties in the area of decision-making, but positive changes and efforts to solve difficulties are visible. The leaders use several methods to make decision-making effective within their jurisdiction, and they suggest possible solutions to the difficulties in decision-making process. Value: Based on the leader interviews, it was revealed which mechanism of decision making in the central public administration is functioning exemplary, and which mechanisms are functioning not so efficient. In those organizations where certain mechanisms need to be developed, there may be possible to develop them with the good practices applied in other organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Belügyi Szemle
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38146/bsz-ajia.2025.v73.i4.pp871-891
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring strengths and areas for development in decision-making in central public administration through the examples of some organizations

Nikolett Nánási-Pintér
Belügyi Szemle
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Exploring strengths and areas for development in decision-making in central public administration through the examples of some organizations

Nikolett Nánási-Pintér
article en

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the research is to use the Healthy Organization Model to explore what strengths and areas for development there are in the public administration, what factors, processes, and characteristics there are in the public administration in which the public administration works very well and effectively based on the interview results of some organizations of the central public administration. In this paper, I will focus on one of the 20 health-disease dimensions of the Healthy Organization Model, which is decision-making. I will illustrate its functioning through the examples of a few organizations in the central public administration. Methodology: Conducting semi-structured interviews with leaders at various levels in several central public administration organizations using an interview guide based on the Healthy Organization Model. Findings: There are organizations and units where this area functions exemplary; there are organizations and units where they face more difficulties in the area of decision-making, but positive changes and efforts to solve difficulties are visible. The leaders use several methods to make decision-making effective within their jurisdiction, and they suggest possible solutions to the difficulties in decision-making process. Value: Based on the leader interviews, it was revealed which mechanism of decision making in the central public administration is functioning exemplary, and which mechanisms are functioning not so efficient. In those organizations where certain mechanisms need to be developed, there may be possible to develop them with the good practices applied in other organizations.

Belügyi SzemleVol. 73(4)
Ministry of Interior (HU)
Magyarország Kormánya
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring strengths and areas for development in decision-making in central public administration through the examples of some organizations — Nikolett Nánási-Pintér · Belügyi Szemle (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS