Numerical study on propeller flow field in four quadrants

The propeller hydrodynamic performance under different direction combinations of the uniform inflow and the propeller rate, i.e. four quadrants (Q1–Q4) conditions, is studied with CFD methods, and validated by the experimental data of a model-scale propeller. The numerical strategies including the turbulence model, the grid size, and the time step are discussed. Regarding the relative direction of the inflow and the propeller jet, RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes) and DDES (Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation) are compared in resolving global and local flow quantities. RANS results show similar near-field flow fields to DDES results in Q1/Q3, while DDES gives more accurate forces and richer flow details such as vortex resolutions for cases with opposite flow directions. Then the propeller is simulated by RANS in Q1/Q3, and by DDES in Q2/Q4. In four quadrants, the propeller thrust and torque, vortex structures, and velocity and pressure distributions are presented for flow mechanism analysis. In Q1/Q3 conditions, the propeller jet evolves in the same direction as the inflow, promising a converged flow field. In Q3, the reverse rotation leads to less significant flow acceleration effects than Q1 under the same inflow velocity, and the non-uniformity of pressure distributions on the blades is strengthened. For Q2/Q4, massive flow separations occur due to the interaction of the propeller jet and counter inflow, and the recirculation zone with reversed axial velocities forms. With increased inflow velocities, the dominant role between the inflow and the propeller jet gradually shifts, and the difference in the propeller jet produced by ahead and astern rotations postpones the shift in Q2 compared with Q4. This study investigates the propeller flow field in four quadrants and can help to quantify rudder inflow variations in hull-propeller-rudder interactions for future research. • The propeller hydrodynamics in four quadrants are studied by CFD and validated. • RANS/DDES are compared in different quadrants. • The four quadrants propeller flow fields are shown for flow mechanism evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Ocean Research
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2025.104576
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical study on propeller flow field in four quadrants

Santiago López Castaño, Guillaume Delefortrie, Wim Van Hoydonck, Evert Lataire et al.
1 citations
Applied Ocean Research
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
1.15
article

Numerical study on propeller flow field in four quadrants

Santiago López Castaño, Guillaume Delefortrie, Wim Van Hoydonck, Evert Lataire, Suli Lu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The propeller hydrodynamic performance under different direction combinations of the uniform inflow and the propeller rate, i.e. four quadrants (Q1–Q4) conditions, is studied with CFD methods, and validated by the experimental data of a model-scale propeller. The numerical strategies including the turbulence model, the grid size, and the time step are discussed. Regarding the relative direction of the inflow and the propeller jet, RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes) and DDES (Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation) are compared in resolving global and local flow quantities. RANS results show similar near-field flow fields to DDES results in Q1/Q3, while DDES gives more accurate forces and richer flow details such as vortex resolutions for cases with opposite flow directions. Then the propeller is simulated by RANS in Q1/Q3, and by DDES in Q2/Q4. In four quadrants, the propeller thrust and torque, vortex structures, and velocity and pressure distributions are presented for flow mechanism analysis. In Q1/Q3 conditions, the propeller jet evolves in the same direction as the inflow, promising a converged flow field. In Q3, the reverse rotation leads to less significant flow acceleration effects than Q1 under the same inflow velocity, and the non-uniformity of pressure distributions on the blades is strengthened. For Q2/Q4, massive flow separations occur due to the interaction of the propeller jet and counter inflow, and the recirculation zone with reversed axial velocities forms. With increased inflow velocities, the dominant role between the inflow and the propeller jet gradually shifts, and the difference in the propeller jet produced by ahead and astern rotations postpones the shift in Q2 compared with Q4. This study investigates the propeller flow field in four quadrants and can help to quantify rudder inflow variations in hull-propeller-rudder interactions for future research. • The propeller hydrodynamics in four quadrants are studied by CFD and validated. • RANS/DDES are compared in different quadrants. • The four quadrants propeller flow fields are shown for flow mechanism evaluations.

Applied Ocean ResearchVol. 158
Ghent University (BE), Flanders Hydraulics (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.