Characteristics of leaf nutrient resorption efficiency in Tibetan alpine permafrost ecosystems

Nutrient resorption is an important strategy for nutrient conservation, especially in permafrost ecosystems where plant growth is limited by nutrients. Based on the measurements mainly derived from tropical, subtropical and temperate regions, current projections suggest that resorption efficiency is higher for leaf nitrogen (N) than for phosphorus (P) in cold regions. However, these projections have not been fully validated due to the lack of observations in permafrost ecosystems. Here, we carry out a large-scale sampling campaign along a permafrost transect on the Tibetan Plateau. Our results show that, in contrast with the prevailing view, resorption efficiency is higher for leaf P than N in permafrost ecosystems (75.1 ± 1.8% vs. 58.7 ± 1.5%; mean ± standard error). Our results also reveal that leaf P resorption efficiency is higher in permafrost ecosystems than in global herbaceous plants, while there is no difference for leaf N resorption efficiency. Interestingly, there is a trade-off between leaf N resorption efficiency and soil N mineralization rate, but no such pattern exists for P. These results illustrate the unique characteristics of plant nutrient resorption in permafrost ecosystems and advance our understanding of nutrient conservation strategies in little-studied permafrost regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59289-x
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Climate change and permafrost
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characteristics of leaf nutrient resorption efficiency in Tibetan alpine permafrost ecosystems

Enzai Du, Meifeng Deng, Yuanhe Yang, Yunfeng Peng et al.
6 citations
Nature Communications
Climate change and permafrost
7.80
article

Characteristics of leaf nutrient resorption efficiency in Tibetan alpine permafrost ecosystems

Enzai Du, Meifeng Deng, Yuanhe Yang, Yunfeng Peng, Lulu Guo, Zhihu Zheng, Lingli Liu, Guibiao Yang, Changsen Zhao
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Nutrient resorption is an important strategy for nutrient conservation, especially in permafrost ecosystems where plant growth is limited by nutrients. Based on the measurements mainly derived from tropical, subtropical and temperate regions, current projections suggest that resorption efficiency is higher for leaf nitrogen (N) than for phosphorus (P) in cold regions. However, these projections have not been fully validated due to the lack of observations in permafrost ecosystems. Here, we carry out a large-scale sampling campaign along a permafrost transect on the Tibetan Plateau. Our results show that, in contrast with the prevailing view, resorption efficiency is higher for leaf P than N in permafrost ecosystems (75.1 ± 1.8% vs. 58.7 ± 1.5%; mean ± standard error). Our results also reveal that leaf P resorption efficiency is higher in permafrost ecosystems than in global herbaceous plants, while there is no difference for leaf N resorption efficiency. Interestingly, there is a trade-off between leaf N resorption efficiency and soil N mineralization rate, but no such pattern exists for P. These results illustrate the unique characteristics of plant nutrient resorption in permafrost ecosystems and advance our understanding of nutrient conservation strategies in little-studied permafrost regions.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Beijing Normal University (CN), Beijing Botanical Garden (CN), Institute of Botany (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), China National Botanical Garden
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Anhui Agricultural University, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate change and permafrost
7.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.