Technical design requirements of a safety reasoning module for run-time risk reduction in Highly Automated Off-road Mobile Machinery

• Automation shifts operators’ roles to event-based intervention supervisors. • Cabin presence adds safety burdens, needing greater risk reduction for automation. • SRM feasibility depends on hardware, software, and Machine Safety standards. • Insights guide SRM development despite challenges in specific automation cases. Highly automated off-road mobile machinery requires reliable safety systems to mitigate work- place risks, particularly when operating in close collaboration with human actors. With the ad- vent of automation, the operator’s role has shifted to that of a supervisor, intervening only during event-based scenarios. This supervisor may be situated either in the cabin or remotely, overseeing multiple machines. This article explores the technical design requirements and feasibility of a safety reasoning module (SRM) through a targeted use case involving the automation of a cut-to-length tree harvester. Specifically, it examines the automation of the log-feeding process required for stem inspection. The SRM’s primary function is to achieve adequate risk reduction while preserving the supervisor’s capacity for effective event-based intervention, thereby supporting a compelling safety case for maintaining a safe operational state at runtime. Currently, the supervisor plays a crucial role in the stem inspection process, requiring cabin presence which adds to the burden placed on required minimum risk reduction and event-based intervention. In the context of this evaluation the realisation of the SRM’s requirements for achieving the necessary risk reduction while conforming to Machine Safety standards indicates it is constrained by limitations in existing hardware and software capabilities. Despite these limitations, this use case outlines a structured approach for developing SRMs for highly automated off-road machin- ery. While achieving the desired risk reduction may not be feasible in this specific scenario, the findings provide valuable insights that can guide the development of SRMs in other applications where similar challenges arise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106883
Primary Topic
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical design requirements of a safety reasoning module for run-time risk reduction in Highly Automated Off-road Mobile Machinery

Reza Ghabcheloo, Tatiana Minav, Marea de Koning
Safety Science
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
article

Technical design requirements of a safety reasoning module for run-time risk reduction in Highly Automated Off-road Mobile Machinery

Reza Ghabcheloo, Tatiana Minav, Marea de Koning
article en

Abstract

• Automation shifts operators’ roles to event-based intervention supervisors. • Cabin presence adds safety burdens, needing greater risk reduction for automation. • SRM feasibility depends on hardware, software, and Machine Safety standards. • Insights guide SRM development despite challenges in specific automation cases. Highly automated off-road mobile machinery requires reliable safety systems to mitigate work- place risks, particularly when operating in close collaboration with human actors. With the ad- vent of automation, the operator’s role has shifted to that of a supervisor, intervening only during event-based scenarios. This supervisor may be situated either in the cabin or remotely, overseeing multiple machines. This article explores the technical design requirements and feasibility of a safety reasoning module (SRM) through a targeted use case involving the automation of a cut-to-length tree harvester. Specifically, it examines the automation of the log-feeding process required for stem inspection. The SRM’s primary function is to achieve adequate risk reduction while preserving the supervisor’s capacity for effective event-based intervention, thereby supporting a compelling safety case for maintaining a safe operational state at runtime. Currently, the supervisor plays a crucial role in the stem inspection process, requiring cabin presence which adds to the burden placed on required minimum risk reduction and event-based intervention. In the context of this evaluation the realisation of the SRM’s requirements for achieving the necessary risk reduction while conforming to Machine Safety standards indicates it is constrained by limitations in existing hardware and software capabilities. Despite these limitations, this use case outlines a structured approach for developing SRMs for highly automated off-road machin- ery. While achieving the desired risk reduction may not be feasible in this specific scenario, the findings provide valuable insights that can guide the development of SRMs in other applications where similar challenges arise.

Safety ScienceVol. 188
Tampere University (FI)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.