Value chains for sustainable mountain development: a qualitative understanding of 23 European cases
This paper presents findings using a novel, qualitative and interpretative approach to value chain assessment. The approach was used to further understand sustainable mountain development. The findings result from 23 diverse cases across 16 European countries, including value chains that focus on animal production for meat and dairy products, arable, horticultural and alcohol production as well as tourism and public goods. The paper focuses on three types of value (economic, socio-cultural and environmental) that are developed along the four stages of each value chain (Production, Processing, Distribution/Marketing and Consumption). It addresses how and why value chain actors perceived changes to these three types of values, including how the value chain is tele-coupled with other sending or receiving systems; and how the focal value chains intertwine with other mountain value chains. In general, the value chains actors’ perceived that positive values were added, supporting sustainable mountain development in our cases, but the findings were most positive for economic issues and least positive for environmental issues. Findings support neo-endogenous rural development arguments. Local cooperation and certification of sustainable practices seem to support valorisation and retain these values in the mountains. We contend that using a value chain lens for mountain development has helped improve the breadth of analysis and highlights the need to consider non-mountain actors and processes within sustainable development processes. • Empirical application of a comparative, qualitative, extended value chain analysis. • Increased economic but mixed socio-cultural and environmental perceived outcomes. • Approach helps understand how global value chains affect mountain capitals. • Governance, cooperation and business size may explain our case outcomes.
Authors
- Kirsty Blackstock (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0429-0215)
- Mark Redman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8762-2851)
- Murat Yercan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8061-0882)
- Romeu Vicente (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5456-1642)
- Rachel Creaney (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3753-7613)
- Jakub Husák (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7166-9252)
- Ana Carvalho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7848-7574)
- Éva Orbán (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-2916)
- Gusztáv Nemes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1461-4794)
- Diana Surová (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7156-3420)
- Sandra Karner
- Angelo Belliggiano
- Sharon Flanigan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7510-4272)
- Michele Moretti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8799-9464)
- Lukáš Zagata (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0170-8516)
- Sofia Triliva (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4075-2579)
- Andrea Conte (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0025-9747)
- Corrado Ievoli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4853-5672)
- Marco Antônio Sandini Trentin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8025-8700)
- Catarina Esgalhado (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3539-3046)
- Tarek Allali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5226-6607)
- Chloe Thompson
- Anna Geiser
- Carmen Maestre-Diaz
- Cristina Micheloni
- Lucca Piccin
- Nehat Ramadani
- Catalina Rogozan
- Jean-Michel Sorba
- Mar del Mar Delgado-Serrano
- Tamara Živadinović
Institutions
- University of Pisa (IT)
- University of Molise (IT)
- James Hutton Institute (GB)
- ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
- Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ)
- University of Évora (PT)
- Vinidea (IT)
- Interdisciplinary Research Centre for Technology, Work and Culture (AT)
- ELTE Centre for Economic and Regional Studies (HU)
- University of Córdoba (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Rural Studies
- Published
- 2025-04-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103640
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Forest Management and Policy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.32