Effect of Waste-Derived Fuels (SRF/RDF) Composition on the Cement Industry’s Environmental Footprint

Abstract Solid recovered fuels (SRF) can be effectively produced in a Sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Treatment Plant (SMSWTP), after applying all the adequate R-processes. It was found that SRF can be used as an alternative solid fuel (ASF) in the cement production process, with substantial regulation of environmental emissions and economic benefits. The adequate replacement of conventional fossil fuels is a promising solution to reduce the environmental footprint of the cement industry. SRF classification in 5 categories, concerning the composition of pollutant generation compounds (e.g., Cl, Hg), tries to contribute toward its use as an ASF in cement kilns. This paper seeks to find a correlation between the SRF composition with the environmental impact of the cement industry. A thorough investigation of recently reported literature data, with emphasis on the ASF composition and the obtained cement kiln emissions, showed that their chlorine content is the main factor that aggravated the environmental impact of ASFs compared to conventional fuels. Chlorine is the crucial compound responsible for the generation of toxic and harmful pollutant compounds such as Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/Furans (PCDD/Fs). ASFs with low chlorine content ≤ 0.2 wt. %, classified as SRF of class 1, were considered in this study. These harmful emissions of a cement kiln are well correlated with the chlorine content of the ASF. Following the derived correlation, it is suggested that the use of ASFs with a chlorine content ≤ 0.078 wt. % can only lead to acceptable cement kiln emissions. The use of low-emission SRF in the cement industry can achieve the goal of the drastic reduction of landfill waste with no extra need in the construction of polluting waste combustion installations while fulfilling the zero-waste target. ASFs with a chlorine content ≤ 0.078 wt. %, particularly lower than that of the class 1 SRF (≤ 0.2 wt. %), must be used in the cement industry to meet the exhaust standards and improve its environmental footprint. Graphical Abstract Adequate preparation and use of SRF can result in sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Management towards almost zero waste to landfills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Waste and Biomass Valorization
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-025-03077-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Waste-Derived Fuels (SRF/RDF) Composition on the Cement Industry’s Environmental Footprint

M.C. Samolada, Nikolaos Morfopoulos
2 citations
Waste and Biomass Valorization
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
1.99
article

Effect of Waste-Derived Fuels (SRF/RDF) Composition on the Cement Industry’s Environmental Footprint

M.C. Samolada, Nikolaos Morfopoulos
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Solid recovered fuels (SRF) can be effectively produced in a Sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Treatment Plant (SMSWTP), after applying all the adequate R-processes. It was found that SRF can be used as an alternative solid fuel (ASF) in the cement production process, with substantial regulation of environmental emissions and economic benefits. The adequate replacement of conventional fossil fuels is a promising solution to reduce the environmental footprint of the cement industry. SRF classification in 5 categories, concerning the composition of pollutant generation compounds (e.g., Cl, Hg), tries to contribute toward its use as an ASF in cement kilns. This paper seeks to find a correlation between the SRF composition with the environmental impact of the cement industry. A thorough investigation of recently reported literature data, with emphasis on the ASF composition and the obtained cement kiln emissions, showed that their chlorine content is the main factor that aggravated the environmental impact of ASFs compared to conventional fuels. Chlorine is the crucial compound responsible for the generation of toxic and harmful pollutant compounds such as Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/Furans (PCDD/Fs). ASFs with low chlorine content ≤ 0.2 wt. %, classified as SRF of class 1, were considered in this study. These harmful emissions of a cement kiln are well correlated with the chlorine content of the ASF. Following the derived correlation, it is suggested that the use of ASFs with a chlorine content ≤ 0.078 wt. % can only lead to acceptable cement kiln emissions. The use of low-emission SRF in the cement industry can achieve the goal of the drastic reduction of landfill waste with no extra need in the construction of polluting waste combustion installations while fulfilling the zero-waste target. ASFs with a chlorine content ≤ 0.078 wt. %, particularly lower than that of the class 1 SRF (≤ 0.2 wt. %), must be used in the cement industry to meet the exhaust standards and improve its environmental footprint. Graphical Abstract Adequate preparation and use of SRF can result in sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Management towards almost zero waste to landfills.

Waste and Biomass ValorizationVol. 16(8)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Hellenic Academic Libraries Link, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
1.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of Waste-Derived Fuels (SRF/RDF) Composition on the Cement Industry’s Environmental Footprint — M.C. Samolada, Nikolaos Morfopoulos · Waste and Biomass Valorization (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS