Synergistic Effects of Joint-Biased Rehabilitation and Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Chronic Ankle Instability: A Single-Blind, Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The ankle joint is among the most frequently injured joints in daily life, with approximately 25% of young adults reporting chronic ankle instability (CAI). This study investigated the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a type of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technique, combined with joint mobilization and active joint mobilization on CAI. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 36 participants (mean age: 20.81 years; 63.89% female; mean body mass index: 21.68) were randomly divided into three groups: (1) tDCS with joint mobilization (<i>n</i> = 12); (2) active joint mobilization (<i>n</i> = 12); and (3) tDCS with active joint mobilization (<i>n</i> = 12). Dynamic balance, range of motion (ROM), static balance, and ankle instability (Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool, CAIT) were evaluated at multiple time points. Interventions were conducted three times per week, for 15 min per session, over four weeks (12 sessions total). <b>Results:</b> All three groups showed significant improvements over time in dynamic balance, ankle instability, ROM, and static balance (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, no significant interaction effects were observed between time and group (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The tDCS with active joint mobilization group demonstrated the largest effect sizes across most outcome measures, particularly for ankle instability, ROM, and static balance, in both immediate and post-intervention assessments. <b>Conclusions:</b> tDCS combined with active joint mobilization appears to be particularly effective in improving CAI. This approach, targeting both top-down mechanisms through non-invasive brain stimulation and local joint function, offers a promising alternative to traditional interventions that focus solely on the ankle joint. This study was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) under the identifier KCT0009566.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050458
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synergistic Effects of Joint-Biased Rehabilitation and Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Chronic Ankle Instability: A Single-Blind, Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial

Jihye Jung, Hyunjoong Kim, Yunseo Kim, Seungwon Lee
4 citations
Brain Sciences
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
3.37
article

Synergistic Effects of Joint-Biased Rehabilitation and Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Chronic Ankle Instability: A Single-Blind, Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial

Jihye Jung, Hyunjoong Kim, Yunseo Kim, Seungwon Lee
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The ankle joint is among the most frequently injured joints in daily life, with approximately 25% of young adults reporting chronic ankle instability (CAI). This study investigated the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a type of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technique, combined with joint mobilization and active joint mobilization on CAI. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 36 participants (mean age: 20.81 years; 63.89% female; mean body mass index: 21.68) were randomly divided into three groups: (1) tDCS with joint mobilization (<i>n</i> = 12); (2) active joint mobilization (<i>n</i> = 12); and (3) tDCS with active joint mobilization (<i>n</i> = 12). Dynamic balance, range of motion (ROM), static balance, and ankle instability (Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool, CAIT) were evaluated at multiple time points. Interventions were conducted three times per week, for 15 min per session, over four weeks (12 sessions total). <b>Results:</b> All three groups showed significant improvements over time in dynamic balance, ankle instability, ROM, and static balance (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, no significant interaction effects were observed between time and group (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The tDCS with active joint mobilization group demonstrated the largest effect sizes across most outcome measures, particularly for ankle instability, ROM, and static balance, in both immediate and post-intervention assessments. <b>Conclusions:</b> tDCS combined with active joint mobilization appears to be particularly effective in improving CAI. This approach, targeting both top-down mechanisms through non-invasive brain stimulation and local joint function, offers a promising alternative to traditional interventions that focus solely on the ankle joint. This study was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) under the identifier KCT0009566.

Brain SciencesVol. 15(5)
Gwangju Health University (KR), Sahmyook University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
3.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.