Jump Squat Momentum: An Alternative Method to Prescribe Jump Squat Loads for Elite Rugby Union Players

Loturco, I, Zabaloy, S, Bishop, C, Mercer, VP, Moura, TBMA, Ramos, MS, Freitas, TT, and Pereira, LA. Jump squat momentum: An alternative method to prescribe jump squat loads for elite rugby union players. J Strength Cond Res 39(7): 780-787, 2025-Rugby union is a team-sport in which collisions and impact forces play a decisive role. In this regard, momentum-based measurements (the product of mass and velocity of a body in a given movement) are frequently used by practitioners. Generally, sprint momentum (SM; the product of sprinting speed and athlete's body mass) is the most commonly considered momentum-based measure by coaches and sport scientists, either to differentiate playing positions or to examine player performance. However, recently, jump squat momentum (JSM) has been suggested as a complementary momentum-based measure because of its strong relationship with SM. In this study, we compared the body mass; half-squat 1 repetition maximum (HS 1RM), in both absolute and relative terms (i.e., relative strength [RS]); sprinting speed and momentum; and JSM of 21 rugby backs and forwards using an independent t test. As expected, forwards are significantly heavier and stronger and exhibit higher SM and JSM than backs ( p ≤ 0.02). By contrast, backs are faster in linear sprints over both 10- and 30-m ( p < 0.001) and exhibit higher values of RS ( p < 0.05). Furthermore, irrespective of the playing position, RS was significantly different between the "low" and "high" RS groups ( p < 0.001). Despite these marked differences, all players achieved their greatest magnitudes of JSM at an average of 40% HS 1RM. Strength and conditioning coaches interested in increasing JSM and its related metrics (e.g., SM) in rugby players could use this specific loading range to prescribe JS loads during their strength-power training sessions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005123
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jump Squat Momentum: An Alternative Method to Prescribe Jump Squat Loads for Elite Rugby Union Players

Irineu Loturco, Maurício S. Ramos, Valter P. Mercer, Santiago Zabaloy et al.
2 citations
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
3.44
article

Jump Squat Momentum: An Alternative Method to Prescribe Jump Squat Loads for Elite Rugby Union Players

Irineu Loturco, Maurício S. Ramos, Valter P. Mercer, Santiago Zabaloy, Tomás T. Freitas, Túlio Bernardo Macedo Alfano Moura, Lucas A. Pereira, Chris John Bishop
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Loturco, I, Zabaloy, S, Bishop, C, Mercer, VP, Moura, TBMA, Ramos, MS, Freitas, TT, and Pereira, LA. Jump squat momentum: An alternative method to prescribe jump squat loads for elite rugby union players. J Strength Cond Res 39(7): 780-787, 2025-Rugby union is a team-sport in which collisions and impact forces play a decisive role. In this regard, momentum-based measurements (the product of mass and velocity of a body in a given movement) are frequently used by practitioners. Generally, sprint momentum (SM; the product of sprinting speed and athlete's body mass) is the most commonly considered momentum-based measure by coaches and sport scientists, either to differentiate playing positions or to examine player performance. However, recently, jump squat momentum (JSM) has been suggested as a complementary momentum-based measure because of its strong relationship with SM. In this study, we compared the body mass; half-squat 1 repetition maximum (HS 1RM), in both absolute and relative terms (i.e., relative strength [RS]); sprinting speed and momentum; and JSM of 21 rugby backs and forwards using an independent t test. As expected, forwards are significantly heavier and stronger and exhibit higher SM and JSM than backs ( p ≤ 0.02). By contrast, backs are faster in linear sprints over both 10- and 30-m ( p < 0.001) and exhibit higher values of RS ( p < 0.05). Furthermore, irrespective of the playing position, RS was significantly different between the "low" and "high" RS groups ( p < 0.001). Despite these marked differences, all players achieved their greatest magnitudes of JSM at an average of 40% HS 1RM. Strength and conditioning coaches interested in increasing JSM and its related metrics (e.g., SM) in rugby players could use this specific loading range to prescribe JS loads during their strength-power training sessions.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchVol. 39(7)
Universidad de Flores (AR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (BR), Middlesex University London (GB), Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports Performance and Training
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.