Effects of a digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation intervention on risk factors, recurrent hospitalization and mortality

We investigated whether a digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation (DeCR) programme, delivered to patients following a heart disease hospitalization, improved patients' cardiovascular disease risk factors and whether they had a reduction in rehospitalizations, spent fewer days in hospital and improved survival compared with matched controls who undertook either face-to-face cardiac rehabilitation (F2F-CR) or usual care.• DeCR was associated with similar healthcare utilization outcomes compared with F2F-CR. This suggests that the potential benefits of DeCR may be comparable. Additionally, DeCR programmes create an opportunity for patients to choose the style of CR to undertake and have an advantage of broader access.• The DeCR group spent significantly fewer readmission days in hospital compared with the usual care group, which may reflect differences in the nature of rehospitalizations when they occur.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf043
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of a digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation intervention on risk factors, recurrent hospitalization and mortality

Agus Salim, Stephanie Yiallourou, M. Carrington, Thomas H. Marwick et al.
6 citations
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
8.33
article

Effects of a digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation intervention on risk factors, recurrent hospitalization and mortality

Agus Salim, Stephanie Yiallourou, M. Carrington, Thomas H. Marwick, Brian Oldenburg, Justin Braver, Catherine Keating, Dulari Hakamuwalekamlage
article en
6 citations

Abstract

We investigated whether a digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation (DeCR) programme, delivered to patients following a heart disease hospitalization, improved patients' cardiovascular disease risk factors and whether they had a reduction in rehospitalizations, spent fewer days in hospital and improved survival compared with matched controls who undertook either face-to-face cardiac rehabilitation (F2F-CR) or usual care.• DeCR was associated with similar healthcare utilization outcomes compared with F2F-CR. This suggests that the potential benefits of DeCR may be comparable. Additionally, DeCR programmes create an opportunity for patients to choose the style of CR to undertake and have an advantage of broader access.• The DeCR group spent significantly fewer readmission days in hospital compared with the usual care group, which may reflect differences in the nature of rehospitalizations when they occur.

European Heart Journal - Digital HealthVol. 6(4)
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Toshiba (United States) (US), Melbourne Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
8.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.