‘I Use <scp>ChatGPT</scp> , but Should I?’ A Multi‐Method Analysis of Students' Practices and Attitudes Towards <scp>AI</scp> in Higher Education

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have the potential to revolutionise educational practices, but their use raises ethical and organisational concerns for higher education institutions (HEIs). We investigated Italian students' perception and usage of AI tools at the University of Udine using questionnaires ( N = 531) with fixed and open‐ended items and semi‐structured interviews ( N = 60). The findings reveal that while over two‐thirds of students use ChatGPT for personal purposes, 40.9% employ it for academic tasks, primarily for summarisation, clarification and content generation. Most students (70%) expressed awareness of ethical concerns, and 55% saw the potential value in using AI, if regulated, for specific learning activities. Students generally did not perceive a direct threat to their studies or career prospects, although 60% voiced reservations about potential negative impacts on broader societal functions. These results underscore the need for HEIs to implement regulations for AI tool use to balance innovation with ethical challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Education
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70094
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘I Use ChatGPT , but Should I?’ A Multi‐Method Analysis of Students' Practices and Attitudes Towards AI in Higher Education

Manuela Farinosi, Claudio Melchior
7 citations
European Journal of Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
4.58
article

‘I Use ChatGPT , but Should I?’ A Multi‐Method Analysis of Students' Practices and Attitudes Towards AI in Higher Education

Manuela Farinosi, Claudio Melchior
article en
7 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have the potential to revolutionise educational practices, but their use raises ethical and organisational concerns for higher education institutions (HEIs). We investigated Italian students' perception and usage of AI tools at the University of Udine using questionnaires ( N = 531) with fixed and open‐ended items and semi‐structured interviews ( N = 60). The findings reveal that while over two‐thirds of students use ChatGPT for personal purposes, 40.9% employ it for academic tasks, primarily for summarisation, clarification and content generation. Most students (70%) expressed awareness of ethical concerns, and 55% saw the potential value in using AI, if regulated, for specific learning activities. Students generally did not perceive a direct threat to their studies or career prospects, although 60% voiced reservations about potential negative impacts on broader societal functions. These results underscore the need for HEIs to implement regulations for AI tool use to balance innovation with ethical challenges.

European Journal of EducationVol. 60(2)
University of Udine (IT)
Università degli Studi di Udine
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
4.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.