Persian Deixis in the Flow of Conversation

ABSTRACT This study investigates the two demonstratives in Persian conversation, namely the proximal een , “this,” and distal oun , “that,” and their plural forms, that constitute the bulk of Persian pronominal and adnominal demonstratives functioning as anaphoric, deictic, discourse‐deictic and recognitional. The data from which these demonstratives are analyzed come from a large corpus of live conversational data occurring between participants who are native speakers of Persian. The analysis of the data is conducted on 5000 intonation units (henceforth IUs), based on Chafe's theory of information flow. The findings have shown that generally the adnominal een outnumbers oun . The analysis has also revealed that, overall, speakers prefer cognitive saliency over the anaphoric distance in the selection of anaphoric choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Linguistica
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12259
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Persian Deixis in the Flow of Conversation

Hossein Shokouhi
Studia Linguistica
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Persian Deixis in the Flow of Conversation

Hossein Shokouhi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the two demonstratives in Persian conversation, namely the proximal een , “this,” and distal oun , “that,” and their plural forms, that constitute the bulk of Persian pronominal and adnominal demonstratives functioning as anaphoric, deictic, discourse‐deictic and recognitional. The data from which these demonstratives are analyzed come from a large corpus of live conversational data occurring between participants who are native speakers of Persian. The analysis of the data is conducted on 5000 intonation units (henceforth IUs), based on Chafe's theory of information flow. The findings have shown that generally the adnominal een outnumbers oun . The analysis has also revealed that, overall, speakers prefer cognitive saliency over the anaphoric distance in the selection of anaphoric choices.

Studia LinguisticaVol. 79(3)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
University of Melbourne
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.