Farm borders and biosecurity bordering: Securing livestock identities in Aotearoa New Zealand

In this paper I conceptualise “biosecurity bordering” as the distribution of biosecurity practices throughout the spaces of everyday life. I explore biosecurity bordering through a case study of the National Animal Identification and Tracing (NAIT) scheme for tracing livestock movements in Aotearoa New Zealand. NAIT acts as a filtering technology, separating (un)healthy animal bodies and (non)compliant farmers. These practices of “firewall bordering” are spatially distributed across sites that extend inwards and outwards from the farm gate. Animal movements across these sites lead to the emergence of “grey zones”, spaces where livestock become disconnected from their digital records. Furthermore, animals become borders in the NAIT scheme: the connections between ears, tags, and data establish a biometric border that aims to secure livestock identities and control their mobilities. But this can lead to the misidentification of some animals as illegitimate border crossers, rendering them as “abject life” without value and therefore cullable. This paper contributes to an emerging area of literature that draws together critical studies of borders and biosecurity, and points to areas for further research into the intimate experiences, and visceral consequences, of biosecurity bordering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486251337285
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Farm borders and biosecurity bordering: Securing livestock identities in Aotearoa New Zealand

Sarah Edwards
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Farm borders and biosecurity bordering: Securing livestock identities in Aotearoa New Zealand

Sarah Edwards
article en

Abstract

In this paper I conceptualise “biosecurity bordering” as the distribution of biosecurity practices throughout the spaces of everyday life. I explore biosecurity bordering through a case study of the National Animal Identification and Tracing (NAIT) scheme for tracing livestock movements in Aotearoa New Zealand. NAIT acts as a filtering technology, separating (un)healthy animal bodies and (non)compliant farmers. These practices of “firewall bordering” are spatially distributed across sites that extend inwards and outwards from the farm gate. Animal movements across these sites lead to the emergence of “grey zones”, spaces where livestock become disconnected from their digital records. Furthermore, animals become borders in the NAIT scheme: the connections between ears, tags, and data establish a biometric border that aims to secure livestock identities and control their mobilities. But this can lead to the misidentification of some animals as illegitimate border crossers, rendering them as “abject life” without value and therefore cullable. This paper contributes to an emerging area of literature that draws together critical studies of borders and biosecurity, and points to areas for further research into the intimate experiences, and visceral consequences, of biosecurity bordering.

Environment and Planning E Nature and SpaceVol. 8(3)
Lincoln University (NZ)
Lincoln University
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.