Prevalence and Determinants of Distress in Young Adult Patients with Cancer in a Private Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background/Importance of the Study: At present, there is not much data on the prevalence of cancer in the young adult population in the local setting, in addition to prevalence and determinants of distress in this population. The findings of this study may help to understand the current situation of this young population, and it may also provide a reference for further improving outcomes among these patients who have a distinct set of needs compared to the older counterparts, in addition to a long life expectancy ahead of them. Study Design: This study employed an observational cross-sectional design that included young adult cancer patients, aged 19 to 39 years old, seen at the hospital outpatient clinics and Cancer Center from October 2023 to December 2023. Demographic and clinical data were collected. The participants were also asked to fill out the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT) Screening Tool and Problem List after signing the written informed consent. Data were collated and analyzed per clinical variable. Results/Analysis: The mean age of the participants was 34.55 years (SD=3.97), with most of them being 36 to 39 years old (51.67%). Comparative analyses of different demographic and clinical characteristics indicated that none of the characteristics were significantly different between those without and with significant distress levels (p>0.05). The mean distress score was 4.11 (SD=2.60) and categorizing these scores using the established cut-off score showed that 58.33% (95% CI = 44.88% to 70.93%) had distress. Time from cancer diagnosis significantly predicted distress development, specifically between 6 and 12 months from cancer diagnosis (aOR = 0.03, p = 0.042). Factors significantly contributing to distress are concerns on changes in eating, loss or change of physical abilities, worry or anxiety, sadness or depression, loss of interest or enjoyment, loneliness, changes in appearance, feelings of worthlessness or being a burden, relationship with friends, ability to have children, taking care of oneself, finances, access to medicine, issues on sense of meaning or purpose, and on death, dying and afterlife (p<0.05). Conclusion: Significant distress is present in more than 50% of young adult cancer patients seen in a private tertiary institution in the Philippines. The time from cancer diagnosis significantly predicted distress development. Emotional and practical concerns significantly contributed to distress in this population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medicine University of Santo Tomas
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35460/2546-1621.2024-0182
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence and Determinants of Distress in Young Adult Patients with Cancer in a Private Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: A Cross-Sectional Study

Regina Edusma-Dy, F. Clemente Gutiérrez
4 links
Journal of Medicine University of Santo Tomas
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
article

Prevalence and Determinants of Distress in Young Adult Patients with Cancer in a Private Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: A Cross-Sectional Study

Regina Edusma-Dy, F. Clemente Gutiérrez
article en

Abstract

Background/Importance of the Study: At present, there is not much data on the prevalence of cancer in the young adult population in the local setting, in addition to prevalence and determinants of distress in this population. The findings of this study may help to understand the current situation of this young population, and it may also provide a reference for further improving outcomes among these patients who have a distinct set of needs compared to the older counterparts, in addition to a long life expectancy ahead of them. Study Design: This study employed an observational cross-sectional design that included young adult cancer patients, aged 19 to 39 years old, seen at the hospital outpatient clinics and Cancer Center from October 2023 to December 2023. Demographic and clinical data were collected. The participants were also asked to fill out the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT) Screening Tool and Problem List after signing the written informed consent. Data were collated and analyzed per clinical variable. Results/Analysis: The mean age of the participants was 34.55 years (SD=3.97), with most of them being 36 to 39 years old (51.67%). Comparative analyses of different demographic and clinical characteristics indicated that none of the characteristics were significantly different between those without and with significant distress levels (p>0.05). The mean distress score was 4.11 (SD=2.60) and categorizing these scores using the established cut-off score showed that 58.33% (95% CI = 44.88% to 70.93%) had distress. Time from cancer diagnosis significantly predicted distress development, specifically between 6 and 12 months from cancer diagnosis (aOR = 0.03, p = 0.042). Factors significantly contributing to distress are concerns on changes in eating, loss or change of physical abilities, worry or anxiety, sadness or depression, loss of interest or enjoyment, loneliness, changes in appearance, feelings of worthlessness or being a burden, relationship with friends, ability to have children, taking care of oneself, finances, access to medicine, issues on sense of meaning or purpose, and on death, dying and afterlife (p<0.05). Conclusion: Significant distress is present in more than 50% of young adult cancer patients seen in a private tertiary institution in the Philippines. The time from cancer diagnosis significantly predicted distress development. Emotional and practical concerns significantly contributed to distress in this population.

Journal of Medicine University of Santo TomasVol. 9(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.