Not Funny Any More? Morality, Meaning, and <i>Manhattan</i>

Abstract In a sense that will be made more precise in the essay that follows, someone might think that it is possible for an artist's work to be rendered less artistically successful by mere dint of her own immoral behaviour or character. Using Woody Allen's film, Manhattan , as a case study, I explain what lies in the way of making good such a claim and, ultimately, why I am highly sceptical about such a project's prospects. In short, what must be established is that knowledge of the author's putative misdeeds or character flaws enables us to better understand the artwork in question, as opposed to distracting us from doing so, and it is extremely difficult to argue for this thesis in a principled, cogent way. Someone who tries to provide such an argument, in discussing Manhattan , is Erich Hatala Matthes. I explain where his argument fails and, in doing this, also suggest that he misinterprets the film.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1358246124000213
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not Funny Any More? Morality, Meaning, and Manhattan

Julian Dodd
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement
Law in Society and Culture
article

Not Funny Any More? Morality, Meaning, and Manhattan

Julian Dodd
article en

Abstract

Abstract In a sense that will be made more precise in the essay that follows, someone might think that it is possible for an artist's work to be rendered less artistically successful by mere dint of her own immoral behaviour or character. Using Woody Allen's film, Manhattan , as a case study, I explain what lies in the way of making good such a claim and, ultimately, why I am highly sceptical about such a project's prospects. In short, what must be established is that knowledge of the author's putative misdeeds or character flaws enables us to better understand the artwork in question, as opposed to distracting us from doing so, and it is extremely difficult to argue for this thesis in a principled, cogent way. Someone who tries to provide such an argument, in discussing Manhattan , is Erich Hatala Matthes. I explain where his argument fails and, in doing this, also suggest that he misinterprets the film.

Royal Institute of Philosophy SupplementVol. 96
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.