Assessing Twitter Data's Deep Sentiment with a Hybrid Ghost Convolution Neural Network Model

Notwithstanding the clear benefits of sentiment analysis of community view as expressed on Twitter and Facebook, a number of issues still exist. The use of hybrid techniques may help minimize sentiment mistakes on compound exercise facts. This study evaluates the dependability of numerous cross methods using a range of datasets. We contrast singles and cross replicas across datasets and domains. Our deep sentiment analysis learning algorithms incorporate text evaluations and tweets. The hybrid model is created by combining the support vector machine (SVM), ghost model convolution neural network (CNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM). Each method's computation time and dependability were assessed. When deep learning and SVM are coupled, hybrid models perform better than single models on all datasets. Deep learning procedures take newly demonstrated their immense potential in sentimentality examination, while previous models were less reliable. In feature maps, linear transformations are used to remove related or redundant topographies. The flicker component creates flicker topographies by removing duplicate and connected properties since apiece inherent nose. CNN needs fewer hyperparameter change and nursing than LSTM, which yields better consequences but takes longer to process. Depending on the task, the integrated model's effectiveness varied, but each one outperformed the others. CNNs, LSTM networks, and SVMs are required aimed at cross deep sentimentality examination education replicas. SVM, LSTM, and CNN are compared by means of cross models, and the accuracy and mistakes of each approach were examined. Hybrid deep learning-SVM models increase the precision of sentiment analysis. According to experimental results, the correctness of the suggested perfect was 91.3 out of a hundred for type 1 datasets and 91.5 percent for type 8 datasets.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i39s.7080
Primary Topic
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Twitter Data's Deep Sentiment with a Hybrid Ghost Convolution Neural Network Model

Supriya Sameer Nalawade
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
article

Assessing Twitter Data's Deep Sentiment with a Hybrid Ghost Convolution Neural Network Model

Supriya Sameer Nalawade
article en

Abstract

Notwithstanding the clear benefits of sentiment analysis of community view as expressed on Twitter and Facebook, a number of issues still exist. The use of hybrid techniques may help minimize sentiment mistakes on compound exercise facts. This study evaluates the dependability of numerous cross methods using a range of datasets. We contrast singles and cross replicas across datasets and domains. Our deep sentiment analysis learning algorithms incorporate text evaluations and tweets. The hybrid model is created by combining the support vector machine (SVM), ghost model convolution neural network (CNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM). Each method's computation time and dependability were assessed. When deep learning and SVM are coupled, hybrid models perform better than single models on all datasets. Deep learning procedures take newly demonstrated their immense potential in sentimentality examination, while previous models were less reliable. In feature maps, linear transformations are used to remove related or redundant topographies. The flicker component creates flicker topographies by removing duplicate and connected properties since apiece inherent nose. CNN needs fewer hyperparameter change and nursing than LSTM, which yields better consequences but takes longer to process. Depending on the task, the integrated model's effectiveness varied, but each one outperformed the others. CNNs, LSTM networks, and SVMs are required aimed at cross deep sentimentality examination education replicas. SVM, LSTM, and CNN are compared by means of cross models, and the accuracy and mistakes of each approach were examined. Hybrid deep learning-SVM models increase the precision of sentiment analysis. According to experimental results, the correctness of the suggested perfect was 91.3 out of a hundred for type 1 datasets and 91.5 percent for type 8 datasets.

Journal of Information Systems Engineering & ManagementVol. 10(39s)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.