The Global Renewable Energy and Sectoral Electrification (GREaSE) Model for Rapid Energy Transition Scenarios

Achieving the Paris Agreement’s 1.5 °C target requires a global-scale energy transition, reaching net-zero emissions by 2050. This transition demands not only a rapid expansion of renewable energy but also significant upfront energy investment, presenting potential trade-offs between near-term energy security and long-term sustainability. Assuming we cannot rely on as yet unproven negative emissions technology, reductions must be achieved directly, requiring fossil fuel phase-out, accelerated electrification, and substantial renewable infrastructure development. This study presents a detailed, transparent methodology for the creation of a simplified global energy system model designed to rapidly evaluate trade-offs between energy and climate policy, integrating energy investment, depletion, and saturation dynamics into energy transition scenarios. The model simulates energy supply and demand across major sectors, accounting for the upfront energy costs of deploying new renewable infrastructure and the dynamics of electrification in different demand sectors. Its transparent, user-controllable framework allows for rapid scenario adjustments based on variables such as population growth, per capita energy demand, rate and extent of electrification, and strength of climate policy. The primary purpose of this paper is to present the system modelling framework. However, we also present preliminary results from scenario analysis that point to two emergent risks: (1) prioritising energy security increases the likelihood of exceeding carbon budgets, while (2) stringent emissions reductions heighten the risk of energy shortages. Even under non-existent climate policy, fossil fuel depletion makes both the renewable transition and electrification of demand inevitable, though delayed transition leads to more severe emissions overshoot. These findings underscore the urgent need for demand reduction strategies and a more nuanced understanding of the energy investment required for decarbonisation. By offering a flexible scenario tool, this study contributes to informed public discourse and policy decisions on balancing energy security, emissions reduction, and climate resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092205
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Global Renewable Energy and Sectoral Electrification (GREaSE) Model for Rapid Energy Transition Scenarios

Richard Davis, James Hopeward, Shannon O’Connor, Peter Akiki
1 citations
Energies
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
0.36
article

The Global Renewable Energy and Sectoral Electrification (GREaSE) Model for Rapid Energy Transition Scenarios

Richard Davis, James Hopeward, Shannon O’Connor, Peter Akiki
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Achieving the Paris Agreement’s 1.5 °C target requires a global-scale energy transition, reaching net-zero emissions by 2050. This transition demands not only a rapid expansion of renewable energy but also significant upfront energy investment, presenting potential trade-offs between near-term energy security and long-term sustainability. Assuming we cannot rely on as yet unproven negative emissions technology, reductions must be achieved directly, requiring fossil fuel phase-out, accelerated electrification, and substantial renewable infrastructure development. This study presents a detailed, transparent methodology for the creation of a simplified global energy system model designed to rapidly evaluate trade-offs between energy and climate policy, integrating energy investment, depletion, and saturation dynamics into energy transition scenarios. The model simulates energy supply and demand across major sectors, accounting for the upfront energy costs of deploying new renewable infrastructure and the dynamics of electrification in different demand sectors. Its transparent, user-controllable framework allows for rapid scenario adjustments based on variables such as population growth, per capita energy demand, rate and extent of electrification, and strength of climate policy. The primary purpose of this paper is to present the system modelling framework. However, we also present preliminary results from scenario analysis that point to two emergent risks: (1) prioritising energy security increases the likelihood of exceeding carbon budgets, while (2) stringent emissions reductions heighten the risk of energy shortages. Even under non-existent climate policy, fossil fuel depletion makes both the renewable transition and electrification of demand inevitable, though delayed transition leads to more severe emissions overshoot. These findings underscore the urgent need for demand reduction strategies and a more nuanced understanding of the energy investment required for decarbonisation. By offering a flexible scenario tool, this study contributes to informed public discourse and policy decisions on balancing energy security, emissions reduction, and climate resilience.

EnergiesVol. 18(9)
University of South Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.