[MÖB-06] Clinical Outcomes of Injectable Biopulmonic Valve Replacement vs. Conventional Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Tetralogy of Fallot Patients with Severe Pulmonary Regurgitation: A Comparative Study
Injectable pulmonary valve replacement, which can be applied without cardiopulmonary bypass, has advantages such as being less invasive and having better postoperative results compared to the conventional procedure. However, more comprehensive studies with long-term results are needed.
Authors
- Vehbi Doğan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3444-3419)
- Ali Kutsal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2742-3209)
- Murat Koç (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4555-2151)
- Sercan Tak
Institutions
- Ministry of Health (TR)
- Turkish Armed Forces (TR)
- Gazi University (TR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Published
- 2024-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.mob-06
- Primary Topic
- Congenital Heart Disease Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00