[MÖB-05] Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study of Carotid-Subclavian Bypass vs. In Situ Fenestration For Left Subclavian Artery Revascularization During Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Single-Center Experience
Endovascular techniques, such as ISNF, have emerged as viable alternatives to traditional carotidsubclavian bypass for LSA revascularization in zone 2 TEVAR procedures. Our findings indicate that ISNF is a feasible and effective method, offering similar perioperative outcomes and mortality rates compared to carotid-subclavian bypass. After a precise patient selection process and under experienced hands, ISNF appears to be associated with similar perioperative outcomes and mortality rates with the carotid-subclavian bypass.
Authors
- Nur Dikmen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7515-8465)
- Levent Yazıcıoğlu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-2706)
- Melisa Kandemir (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2536-3820)
- Evren Özçınar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6151-2147)
- Çağdaş Baran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4079-4442)
- Onur Büyükçakır
Institutions
- Ankara University (TR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Published
- 2024-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.mob-05
- Primary Topic
- Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00