Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided and Palpation Techniques for Radial Artery Cannulation

Background: Radial artery cannulation is a routine procedure performed in operating rooms and intensive care units for continuous blood pressure monitoring and arterial blood gas analysis. Among the various techniques available, ultrasound-guided (USG) and palpation methods are commonly used. This study aimed to compare the success rate, average time for successful cannulation, first-attempt success rate, and complication rates between the USG-guided and palpation techniques for radial artery cannulation. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital, involving 52 patients aged 19 to 77 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–IV undergoing major surgery. Participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups. In Ultrasound group cannulation using ultrasound guidance, similarly in palpation group cannulation performed by the palpation method. Demographic characteristics, baseline vital signs, time required for successful cannulation, number of attempts, success or failure, and complications (mainly hematoma) present or absent were noted. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics or baseline vital signs between the groups. The overall success rate was identical in both groups (96.2%vs 96.25) and was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Average time for successful cannulation were similar (59sec vs 60sec) (p = 0.808). There was higher first attempt success rate in ultrasound group compared with palpation. {(61.8% vs. 30.8%) P=0.026}.The median number of attempts for successful cannulation were less in USG guided group compared to palpation group i.e. {1(1, 2) vs. 2(1,3)} (p=0.024).There were fewer underlying hematoma in ultrasound guided group i.e. 11.5% vs. 30.8% but that was statically non-significant (p=0.090). Conclusion: In our study, there was similar time duration for successful cannulation and overall success rate for both groups. However, there was a higher first attempt success rate, the fewer number of cannulation attempts in ultrasound guided method compared to the palpation method. Novelty: This study highlights the clinical advantage of ultrasound guidance in improving the efficiency of radial artery cannulation by increasing the likelihood of first-attempt success and reducing the number of attempts, supporting its wider adoption in perioperative and critical care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v8i2.77810
Primary Topic
Vascular Procedures and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided and Palpation Techniques for Radial Artery Cannulation

Allen Suwal, S Maharjan, Puncho Gurung, Sudip Sapkota
Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
Vascular Procedures and Complications
article

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided and Palpation Techniques for Radial Artery Cannulation

Allen Suwal, S Maharjan, Puncho Gurung, Sudip Sapkota
article en

Abstract

Background: Radial artery cannulation is a routine procedure performed in operating rooms and intensive care units for continuous blood pressure monitoring and arterial blood gas analysis. Among the various techniques available, ultrasound-guided (USG) and palpation methods are commonly used. This study aimed to compare the success rate, average time for successful cannulation, first-attempt success rate, and complication rates between the USG-guided and palpation techniques for radial artery cannulation. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital, involving 52 patients aged 19 to 77 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–IV undergoing major surgery. Participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups. In Ultrasound group cannulation using ultrasound guidance, similarly in palpation group cannulation performed by the palpation method. Demographic characteristics, baseline vital signs, time required for successful cannulation, number of attempts, success or failure, and complications (mainly hematoma) present or absent were noted. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics or baseline vital signs between the groups. The overall success rate was identical in both groups (96.2%vs 96.25) and was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Average time for successful cannulation were similar (59sec vs 60sec) (p = 0.808). There was higher first attempt success rate in ultrasound group compared with palpation. {(61.8% vs. 30.8%) P=0.026}.The median number of attempts for successful cannulation were less in USG guided group compared to palpation group i.e. {1(1, 2) vs. 2(1,3)} (p=0.024).There were fewer underlying hematoma in ultrasound guided group i.e. 11.5% vs. 30.8% but that was statically non-significant (p=0.090). Conclusion: In our study, there was similar time duration for successful cannulation and overall success rate for both groups. However, there was a higher first attempt success rate, the fewer number of cannulation attempts in ultrasound guided method compared to the palpation method. Novelty: This study highlights the clinical advantage of ultrasound guidance in improving the efficiency of radial artery cannulation by increasing the likelihood of first-attempt success and reducing the number of attempts, supporting its wider adoption in perioperative and critical care settings.

Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 8(2)
Patan Academy of Health Sciences (NP), Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital (NP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Vascular Procedures and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.