Selective Similarity Preference: People with a “Darker Core” Desire More Partner Similarity in Dark Traits but Not in Big Five

Research on assortative mating has shown that couples share strong similarities in demographic and attitudinal variables, while the similarity in personality is generally weak. However, a recent meta-analysis indicated that couple similarity in dark traits is considerably greater than that in the Big Five. If these differential similarities are primarily due to active preference, we expect that (1) the desire for similarity in dark traits should be higher than that for the Big Five and (2) the strongest desire for partner similarity in dark traits should come from the “darkest” individuals (i.e., with the darkest core). Participants (n = 2465) rated themselves and their ideal partner in Dark Triad and Big Five traits. They also rated their own dark core. The results showed consistent evidence for desired similarity in dark traits; however, this similarity was no greater than that for the Big Five. Further, dark core generally moderated desired similarity on dark traits such that people with a darker core preferred stronger partner similarity in dark traits. This pattern was only observed for Agreeableness on the Big Five. A new explanation was proposed to reconcile these paradoxical findings concerning desired and actual similarity in dark traits in comparison to the Big Five.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe16090128
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selective Similarity Preference: People with a “Darker Core” Desire More Partner Similarity in Dark Traits but Not in Big Five

Whitney Wall, Haorui Wu, Shanhong Luo, Karryll Winborne-Phillips
European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

Selective Similarity Preference: People with a “Darker Core” Desire More Partner Similarity in Dark Traits but Not in Big Five

Whitney Wall, Haorui Wu, Shanhong Luo, Karryll Winborne-Phillips
article en

Abstract

Research on assortative mating has shown that couples share strong similarities in demographic and attitudinal variables, while the similarity in personality is generally weak. However, a recent meta-analysis indicated that couple similarity in dark traits is considerably greater than that in the Big Five. If these differential similarities are primarily due to active preference, we expect that (1) the desire for similarity in dark traits should be higher than that for the Big Five and (2) the strongest desire for partner similarity in dark traits should come from the “darkest” individuals (i.e., with the darkest core). Participants (n = 2465) rated themselves and their ideal partner in Dark Triad and Big Five traits. They also rated their own dark core. The results showed consistent evidence for desired similarity in dark traits; however, this similarity was no greater than that for the Big Five. Further, dark core generally moderated desired similarity on dark traits such that people with a darker core preferred stronger partner similarity in dark traits. This pattern was only observed for Agreeableness on the Big Five. A new explanation was proposed to reconcile these paradoxical findings concerning desired and actual similarity in dark traits in comparison to the Big Five.

European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and EducationVol. 16(9)
Fayetteville State University (US), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.