Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review

Large language models (LLMs) have been positioned to revolutionize HCI, by reshaping not only the interfaces, design patterns, and sociotechnical systems that we study, but also the research practices we use.To-date, however, there has been little understanding of LLMs' uptake in HCI.We address this gap via a systematic literature review of 153 CHI papers from 2020-24 that engage with LLMs.We taxonomize: (1) domains where LLMs are applied; (2) roles of LLMs in HCI projects; (3) contribution types; and (4) acknowledged limitations and risks.We find LLM work in 10 diverse domains, primarily via empirical and artifact contributions.Authors use LLMs in five distinct roles, including as research tools or simulated users.Still, authors often raise validity and reproducibility concerns, and overwhelmingly study closed models.We outline opportunities to improve HCI research with and on LLMs, and provide guiding questions for researchers to consider the validity and appropriateness of LLM-related work. CCS Concepts

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713726
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
32.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review

Rock Yuren Pang, Hope Schroeder, Emily Tseng, Kynnedy Simone Smith et al.
13 citations
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
32.25
article

Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review

Rock Yuren Pang, Hope Schroeder, Emily Tseng, Kynnedy Simone Smith, Danielle Bragg, Solon Barocas, Ziang Xiao
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have been positioned to revolutionize HCI, by reshaping not only the interfaces, design patterns, and sociotechnical systems that we study, but also the research practices we use.To-date, however, there has been little understanding of LLMs' uptake in HCI.We address this gap via a systematic literature review of 153 CHI papers from 2020-24 that engage with LLMs.We taxonomize: (1) domains where LLMs are applied; (2) roles of LLMs in HCI projects; (3) contribution types; and (4) acknowledged limitations and risks.We find LLM work in 10 diverse domains, primarily via empirical and artifact contributions.Authors use LLMs in five distinct roles, including as research tools or simulated users.Still, authors often raise validity and reproducibility concerns, and overwhelmingly study closed models.We outline opportunities to improve HCI research with and on LLMs, and provide guiding questions for researchers to consider the validity and appropriateness of LLM-related work. CCS Concepts

Microsoft (United States) (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Washington (US), IIT@MIT (US), Microsoft Research New York City (United States), Columbia University (US)
National Science Foundation, Microsoft Research, University of Washington
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
32.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.