The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers

The rise of Generative AI (GenAI) in knowledge workflows raises questions about its impact on critical thinking skills and practices.We survey 319 knowledge workers to investigate 1) when and how they perceive the enaction of critical thinking when using GenAI, and 2) when and why GenAI affects their effort to do so.Participants shared 936 first-hand examples of using GenAI in work tasks.Quantitatively, when considering both task-and user-specific factors, a user's task-specific self-confidence and confidence in GenAI are predictive of whether critical thinking is enacted and the effort of doing so in GenAI-assisted tasks.Specifically, higher confidence in GenAI is associated with less critical thinking, while higher self-confidence is associated with more critical thinking.Qualitatively, GenAI shifts the nature of critical thinking toward information verification, response integration, and task stewardship.Our insights reveal new design challenges and opportunities for developing GenAI tools for knowledge work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713778
Citations
211
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
523.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers

Ian Drosos, Advait Sarkar, Sean Rintel, Lev Tankelevitch et al.
211 citations
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
523.48
article

The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers

Ian Drosos, Advait Sarkar, Sean Rintel, Lev Tankelevitch, Hao-Ping Lee, Richard Banks, Nicholas Wilson
article en
211 citations

Abstract

The rise of Generative AI (GenAI) in knowledge workflows raises questions about its impact on critical thinking skills and practices.We survey 319 knowledge workers to investigate 1) when and how they perceive the enaction of critical thinking when using GenAI, and 2) when and why GenAI affects their effort to do so.Participants shared 936 first-hand examples of using GenAI in work tasks.Quantitatively, when considering both task-and user-specific factors, a user's task-specific self-confidence and confidence in GenAI are predictive of whether critical thinking is enacted and the effort of doing so in GenAI-assisted tasks.Specifically, higher confidence in GenAI is associated with less critical thinking, while higher self-confidence is associated with more critical thinking.Qualitatively, GenAI shifts the nature of critical thinking toward information verification, response integration, and task stewardship.Our insights reveal new design challenges and opportunities for developing GenAI tools for knowledge work.

Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Microsoft Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
523.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.