Exploring Alternative Socio-Technical Systems for Careful Data Work in Recovery Contexts

Non-profits such as voluntary and community-based (VC) organisations are facing increasing pressures to engage in data work to sustain themselves. They face challenges with practices, information systems and tools associated with capturing data for supporting service provision. Most recently, researchers working with VC organisations have turned to Feminist and Care discourses to envision alternatives to current socio-technical systems whereby their values and purposes do not match with those of non-profits, consequently pulling the latter away from their socially driven mission. We report on a longitudinal, collaborative study with a UK-based mental health peer support organisation that created innovative tools as a means of navigating current pressures to practice data work for the quantification of mental health service provision. We present findings from interviews conducted with our community partner and share how recovery work has informed careful data practices, offering recommendations for supporting data work in mental health recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713537
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Alternative Socio-Technical Systems for Careful Data Work in Recovery Contexts

Angela Glascott, Alison Osborne, Alisdair Cameron, Abigail Durrant et al.
1 citations
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
2.82
article

Exploring Alternative Socio-Technical Systems for Careful Data Work in Recovery Contexts

Angela Glascott, Alison Osborne, Alisdair Cameron, Abigail Durrant, Caroline Claisse, Elizabeth Sillence
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Non-profits such as voluntary and community-based (VC) organisations are facing increasing pressures to engage in data work to sustain themselves. They face challenges with practices, information systems and tools associated with capturing data for supporting service provision. Most recently, researchers working with VC organisations have turned to Feminist and Care discourses to envision alternatives to current socio-technical systems whereby their values and purposes do not match with those of non-profits, consequently pulling the latter away from their socially driven mission. We report on a longitudinal, collaborative study with a UK-based mental health peer support organisation that created innovative tools as a means of navigating current pressures to practice data work for the quantification of mental health service provision. We present findings from interviews conducted with our community partner and share how recovery work has informed careful data practices, offering recommendations for supporting data work in mental health recovery.

Northumbria University (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring Alternative Socio-Technical Systems for Careful Data Work in Recovery Contexts — Angela Glascott, Alison Osborne, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS