Digital Technologies and Human Trafficking: Combating Coercive Control and Navigating Digital Autonomy

This paper describes a qualitative study that interrogates the types of technology-facilitated coercive control faced by survivors of human trafcking and uncovers potential interventions to aid survivors' recovery.Via semi-structured interviews with 21 participants, including trafcking survivors and professional advocates, we show how trafckers use technology as a lever for control, engaging in surveillance, blackmail, impersonation, and harassment as they compel survivors to stay in the trafcking situation.In recovery, digital footprints keep survivors tethered to their traffcking experience, impacting their digital autonomy, economic mobility, and feelings of safety.Nevertheless, technology can also be a valuable tool for survivors' recovery, connecting them to essential resources and support systems.We discuss the need for interventions and services that account for the specifcity of the trafcking context to help survivors attain digital safety and autonomy, including the potential to adapt existing tech safety services designed for other contexts to human trafcking. CCS Concepts Human-centered computing Empirical studies in HCI ; Security and privacy Human and societal aspects of security and privacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713544
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sex work and related issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Technologies and Human Trafficking: Combating Coercive Control and Navigating Digital Autonomy

Thomas Ristenpart, Nicola Dell, Sophie Stephenson, Lana Ramjit
1 citations
Sex work and related issues
4.20
article

Digital Technologies and Human Trafficking: Combating Coercive Control and Navigating Digital Autonomy

Thomas Ristenpart, Nicola Dell, Sophie Stephenson, Lana Ramjit
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper describes a qualitative study that interrogates the types of technology-facilitated coercive control faced by survivors of human trafcking and uncovers potential interventions to aid survivors' recovery.Via semi-structured interviews with 21 participants, including trafcking survivors and professional advocates, we show how trafckers use technology as a lever for control, engaging in surveillance, blackmail, impersonation, and harassment as they compel survivors to stay in the trafcking situation.In recovery, digital footprints keep survivors tethered to their traffcking experience, impacting their digital autonomy, economic mobility, and feelings of safety.Nevertheless, technology can also be a valuable tool for survivors' recovery, connecting them to essential resources and support systems.We discuss the need for interventions and services that account for the specifcity of the trafcking context to help survivors attain digital safety and autonomy, including the potential to adapt existing tech safety services designed for other contexts to human trafcking. CCS Concepts Human-centered computing Empirical studies in HCI ; Security and privacy Human and societal aspects of security and privacy.

University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Cornell University (US), Jacobs Institute (US)
U.S. Department of Justice
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sex work and related issues
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.