Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit Tooling

Audits are critical mechanisms for identifying the risks and limitations of deployed artifcial intelligence (AI) systems.However, the efective execution of AI audits remains incredibly difcult, and practitioners often need to make use of various tools to support their eforts.Drawing on interviews with 35 AI audit practitioners and a landscape analysis of 435 tools, we compare the current ecosystem of AI audit tooling to practitioner needs.While many tools are designed to help set standards and evaluate AI systems, they often fall short in supporting accountability.We outline challenges practitioners faced in their eforts to use AI audit tools and highlight areas for future tool development beyond evaluationfrom harms discovery to advocacy.We conclude that the available resources do not currently support the full scope of AI audit practitioners' needs and recommend that the feld move beyond tools for just evaluation and towards more comprehensive infrastructure for AI accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713301
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit Tooling

Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Abeba Birhane, Briana Vecchione, Ryan Steed et al.
11 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
23.66
article

Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit Tooling

Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Abeba Birhane, Briana Vecchione, Ryan Steed, Victor Ojewale
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Audits are critical mechanisms for identifying the risks and limitations of deployed artifcial intelligence (AI) systems.However, the efective execution of AI audits remains incredibly difcult, and practitioners often need to make use of various tools to support their eforts.Drawing on interviews with 35 AI audit practitioners and a landscape analysis of 435 tools, we compare the current ecosystem of AI audit tooling to practitioner needs.While many tools are designed to help set standards and evaluate AI systems, they often fall short in supporting accountability.We outline challenges practitioners faced in their eforts to use AI audit tools and highlight areas for future tool development beyond evaluationfrom harms discovery to advocacy.We conclude that the available resources do not currently support the full scope of AI audit practitioners' needs and recommend that the feld move beyond tools for just evaluation and towards more comprehensive infrastructure for AI accountability.

Trinity College Dublin (IE), Brown University (US), Data & Society Research Institute (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Carnegie Mellon University, University of Notre Dame, Science Foundation Ireland, Mozilla Foundation, European Regional Development Fund
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
23.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit Tooling — Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Abeba Birhane, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS